Influence of Lateral Cephalometric Radiography on Treatment Planning and Preferences in Skeletal Open-Bite Patients: Do Lateral Cephalograms Influence Treatment Planning?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorStupar, Irina
dc.contributor.authorYetkiner, Enver
dc.contributor.authorAttin, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorAttin, Rengin
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-27T11:24:18Z
dc.date.available2019-10-27T11:24:18Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To investigate the influence of diagnostic data derived from lateral cephalometric radiographs (LCR) on treatment preferences of specialists planning skeletal open-bite treatment. Methods: Diagnostic records of 25 patients who had been treated at the University of Zurich, Department of Orthodontics, between 1988 and 2007 comprised the study material. Inclusion criteria were 1) skeletal open-bite with no marked antero-posterior discrepancy, 2) dental open-bite, and 3) crowding less than 5 mm. Records consisted of extra-intraoral photographs, panoramic-cephalometric X-rays, casts, and results of analyses. Records, with cephalograms of randomly chosen patients removed, were digitally presented to two orthodontists (A and B), and treatment preferences were asked using Likert-type questionnaires. Three months later, the same records were redelivered with missing cephalograms provided and present cephalograms removed with the questionnaire. Data were evaluated for consistency and tendency to extract using Kappa-kappa and McNemar tests. Results: Orthodontist B had no poor-agreement scores, whereas orthodontist A presented very-poor agreement for headgear use. Both A (kappa=0.833) and B (kappa=0.737) had good to very-good agreement in terms of extraction decisions. Neither orthodontist had any significant tendency for extraction/non-extraction therapy (A=0.99; B=0.5). Conclusion: Information deduced from LCRs had limited influence on treatment planning preferences in skeletal/dental open-bite patients with no marked antero-posterior discrepancy and no influence on extraction/non-extraction decision.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Zurichen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by the University of Zurich.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2016.1609
dc.identifier.endpage90en_US
dc.identifier.issn2528-9659
dc.identifier.issn2148-9505
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid30112480en_US
dc.identifier.startpage87en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2016.1609
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/33264
dc.identifier.volume29en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000439324700001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAves Press Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal of Orthodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCephalometryen_US
dc.subjectopen biteen_US
dc.subjectradiographic image interpretationen_US
dc.subjecttooth extractionen_US
dc.titleInfluence of Lateral Cephalometric Radiography on Treatment Planning and Preferences in Skeletal Open-Bite Patients: Do Lateral Cephalograms Influence Treatment Planning?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu