A study on the protective activity of kefir against gastric ulcer
dc.contributor.author | Orhan Y.T. | |
dc.contributor.author | Karagözlü C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Sarioglu S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Yilmaz O. | |
dc.contributor.author | Murat N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Gidener S. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-10-26T21:45:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-10-26T21:45:38Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.department | Ege Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Background/aims: The effect of kefir on peptic ulcer disease was evaluated in an experimental model, with non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs, together with the determination of gastric mucus secretion by quantitative digital histochemistry. Materials and Methods: The experimental group included 28 male albino Wistar rats. After a diet with standard rat bait for 7 days, 14 rats were fed with kefir for 7 days while the others were kept on the same diet. At the 14th day, indomethacin was injected to 7 of the rats fed on kefir and to 7 of the rats on standard rat bait. All the rats were sacrificed after 4 hours. Gastric erosion and ulceration were scored histopathologically. Mucosal mucus was quantified by image analysis, and periodic acid-Schiff stained area percentage was determined. Results: Erosion and ulceration were identified only in cases that received indomethacin. In the cases on kefir, erosion was identified in 6 cases (86%) and ulceration in 1 case. Rats fed on standard diet had erosion in 4 cases (57%) and ulceration in 3 (43%), but the difference was statistically insignificant (Mann-Whitney test, p=0.25). The stained area percentage for gastric mucus was not different between the four groups (Kruskal-Wallis test, p=0.313). Conclusions: These findings suggest that kefir does not change gastric mucus secretion. Although statistically insignificant, as there were more cases with ulceration in cases on the rat diet, kefir might have a beneficial effect on peptic ulcer disease induced by non-steroid anti-inflammatory drug. This requires further evaluation in larger series. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.4318/tjg.2012.0343 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 338 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1300-4948 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 22965503 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 333 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.4318/tjg.2012.0343 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11454/18518 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 23 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | TR-Dizin | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Gastric ulcer | en_US |
dc.subject | Image analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | Kefir | en_US |
dc.subject | Probiotics | en_US |
dc.title | A study on the protective activity of kefir against gastric ulcer | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |