The effect of cannula material on the pain of peripheral intravenous cannulation in the emergency department: A prospective, randomized controlled study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorÖzsaraç M.
dc.contributor.authorDolek M.
dc.contributor.authorSarsilmaz M.
dc.contributor.authorSever M.
dc.contributor.authorSener S.
dc.contributor.authorKiyan S.
dc.contributor.authorYürüktümen A.
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz G.
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-26T21:42:28Z
dc.date.available2019-10-26T21:42:28Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The present study was undertaken to compare the pain of peripheral IV cannulation (IVC) using a 20-G peripheral biomaterial PEU-Vialon cannula or the 20-G compound FEP-Teflon cannula widely used in clinical practice. Methods: A prospective, randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial was undertaken at the ED of University Hospital. Eighty-nine noncritically ill adult patients who were receiving an IV line as part of their care were enrolled. In each case cannulas were applicated to the antecubital area. Participants rated their pain on a visual analog scale (VAS). The primary outcome was patients pain score, and the secondary outcome was the provider's perception of safety and satisfaction. Results: The two treatment groups did not differ in age, gender or cannulation indication (p>0.05). Mean VAS was 2.80 for PEU and 3.56 for FEP (p=0.061). Mean provider safety scores were 4.84 (4 to 5) in the PEU group and 4.00 (2 to 5) in the FEP group (p=0.0001). Mean provider satisfaction of application scores were 4.65 in the PEU group and 4.56 in the FEP group (p>0.05). Conclusions: Althogh provider safety perception is high, perception of pain has not reduced when inserting PEU-Vialon cannula compared with compound of FEP.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5505/1304.7361.2012.47855
dc.identifier.endpage156en_US
dc.identifier.issn1304-7361
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage151en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5505/1304.7361.2012.47855
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/18350
dc.identifier.volume12en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkiye Acil Tip Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnalgesiaen_US
dc.subjectCannulationen_US
dc.subjectEmergency medicineen_US
dc.subjectPainen_US
dc.subjectPain measurementen_US
dc.titleThe effect of cannula material on the pain of peripheral intravenous cannulation in the emergency department: A prospective, randomized controlled studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu