Prevalence of cypress pollen sensitization and its clinical importance in Izmir, Turkey, with cypress allergy assessed by nasal provocation
dc.contributor.author | Sin, A. Z. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ersoy, R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Gulbahar, O. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ardeniz, O. | |
dc.contributor.author | Gokmen, N. M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kokuludag, A. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-10-27T19:57:11Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-10-27T19:57:11Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.department | Ege Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Background and objective: Pollens from the Cupressaceae family are considered important allergens in the Mediterranean area, though reports of the prevalence of allergic symptoms have ranged from 1.04% to 35.4%. Our aim was to detect the prevalence of cypress pollen sensitization and determine its clinical importance in patients with seasonal respiratory allergy. Methods: We used skin prick tests (SPT) and serum specific IgE assays to reveal sensitization to cypress pollen. In patients who showed positive results to cypress pollen, a nasal provocation test (NPT) with pollen extract was used to assess the target organ response. Results: Sixty-five (14.3%) of 455 patients showed positive SPT responses to Cupressus sempervirens extract. Only I patient was monosensitized while 64 patients were polysensitized. Among those, 2 pollen cosensitizations were found to be significant (86% were cosensitized to grasses and 72% were cosensitized to olive (P <.001). Serum specific IgE to cypress pollen was measured in 50 of the 65 patients; findings were positive for 37. When these 37 patients underwent NPT with C sempervirens allergen extract, only the single monosensitized patient had a positive NPT. Conclusion: A positive SPT to cypress pollen may not reflect the true prevalence of sensitization. We assume that in the absence of a positive NPT, positive SPT results might be related to the presence of cross-reactivity between pollen species. | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 51 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1018-9068 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 18361102 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 46 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11454/40919 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 18 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000253388600008 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | N/A | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Esmon Publicidad S A | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | allergy | en_US |
dc.subject | cypress pollen | en_US |
dc.subject | cross-reactivity | en_US |
dc.subject | nasal provocation | en_US |
dc.title | Prevalence of cypress pollen sensitization and its clinical importance in Izmir, Turkey, with cypress allergy assessed by nasal provocation | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |