Prevalence of cypress pollen sensitization and its clinical importance in Izmir, Turkey, with cypress allergy assessed by nasal provocation

dc.contributor.authorSin, A. Z.
dc.contributor.authorErsoy, R.
dc.contributor.authorGulbahar, O.
dc.contributor.authorArdeniz, O.
dc.contributor.authorGokmen, N. M.
dc.contributor.authorKokuludag, A.
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-27T19:57:11Z
dc.date.available2019-10-27T19:57:11Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground and objective: Pollens from the Cupressaceae family are considered important allergens in the Mediterranean area, though reports of the prevalence of allergic symptoms have ranged from 1.04% to 35.4%. Our aim was to detect the prevalence of cypress pollen sensitization and determine its clinical importance in patients with seasonal respiratory allergy. Methods: We used skin prick tests (SPT) and serum specific IgE assays to reveal sensitization to cypress pollen. In patients who showed positive results to cypress pollen, a nasal provocation test (NPT) with pollen extract was used to assess the target organ response. Results: Sixty-five (14.3%) of 455 patients showed positive SPT responses to Cupressus sempervirens extract. Only I patient was monosensitized while 64 patients were polysensitized. Among those, 2 pollen cosensitizations were found to be significant (86% were cosensitized to grasses and 72% were cosensitized to olive (P <.001). Serum specific IgE to cypress pollen was measured in 50 of the 65 patients; findings were positive for 37. When these 37 patients underwent NPT with C sempervirens allergen extract, only the single monosensitized patient had a positive NPT. Conclusion: A positive SPT to cypress pollen may not reflect the true prevalence of sensitization. We assume that in the absence of a positive NPT, positive SPT results might be related to the presence of cross-reactivity between pollen species.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage51en_US
dc.identifier.issn1018-9068
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid18361102en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage46en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/40919
dc.identifier.volume18en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000253388600008en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEsmon Publicidad S Aen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectallergyen_US
dc.subjectcypress pollenen_US
dc.subjectcross-reactivityen_US
dc.subjectnasal provocationen_US
dc.titlePrevalence of cypress pollen sensitization and its clinical importance in Izmir, Turkey, with cypress allergy assessed by nasal provocationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar