The effect of composite placement technique on the internal adaptation, gap formation and microshear bond strength

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid56030917500
dc.authorscopusid57208738688
dc.authorscopusid56388753200
dc.authorwosidPeskersoy, Cem/GPK-6028-2022
dc.authorwosidRECEN, DUYGU/GXI-0070-2022
dc.contributor.authorPeskersoy, Cem
dc.contributor.authorRecen, Duygu
dc.contributor.authorKemaloglu, Hande
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-12T20:12:32Z
dc.date.available2023-01-12T20:12:32Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentN/A/Departmenten_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose This study aimed to compare the efficiency of placement technique on internal adaptation, gap formation and microshear bond strength (#SBS) of bulk-fill composite resin materials. Materials and Methods Standardized class V cavities were prepared for microcomputed tomography (mCT) test and divided into four groups (n=12) as follows: Group SDR: Smart Dentin Replacement system/bulk fill; Group SF2: Sonic-Fill system/bulk fill sonic-activated composite placement system; Group CHU: Herculite-XRV-Ultra composite resin inserted with Compothixo/sonic-vibrated composite resin placement system; Group HIT: Herculite-XRV-Ultra composite resin applied with incremental technique. Self-etch adhesive (Optibond-XTR) was used for bonding in all groups. After 10000 thermocycling, mCT scans were taken to reveal gap formation at the tooth restoration interface and universal testing machine was used to test microshear bond strength (#SBS) values (n=10). ANOVA, post-hoc Bonferroni and Tukey HSD tests were used for evaluating the gap formation and #SBS values (p=0.05). Results SF2 and CHU showed the best adaptability compared with both SDR and HIT. The difference between groups SDR and HIT was statistically significant (p<0.05). #SBS values were found to be the highest for SF2, and the lowest for HIT groups (p>0.05). Conclusion Bulk-fill composite resins placed either with sonic-activated or sonic-vibrated instrument demonstrated better adaptability, less gap formation and higher bond strength than both the bulk-fill flowable composite and conventional incremental techniques.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.26650/eor.2022897456
dc.identifier.endpage16en_US
dc.identifier.issn2630-6158
dc.identifier.issn2651-2823
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid35478705en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85125870179en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage10en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1116457en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.26650/eor.2022897456
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1116457
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/78320
dc.identifier.volume56en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000752140400002en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIstanbul Univ Press, Istanbul Univ Rectorateen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Oral Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectBulk-fill compositeen_US
dc.subjectmicrocomputed tomographyen_US
dc.subjectgap formationen_US
dc.subjectbond strengthen_US
dc.subjectsonic instrumentationen_US
dc.subjectFill Resin Compositesen_US
dc.subjectBulk-Fillen_US
dc.subjectShrinkage Assessmenten_US
dc.subjectComputed Tomographyen_US
dc.subjectContractionen_US
dc.subjectLeakageen_US
dc.subjectStressen_US
dc.subjectPerformanceen_US
dc.titleThe effect of composite placement technique on the internal adaptation, gap formation and microshear bond strengthen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu