Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in patients with cataract and maculopathy

dc.contributor.authorTeker, Mehmet Esat
dc.contributor.authorDeğirmenci, Cumali
dc.contributor.authorAfrashi, Filiz
dc.contributor.authorEğrilmez, Sait
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-25T18:51:53Z
dc.date.available2024-08-25T18:51:53Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The purpose of the study was to compare the effect of biometric formulas used in calculating intraocular lens (IOL) power on target refraction when planning cataract surgery in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME), age-related macular degeneration (AMD), or epiretinal membrane (ERM). Methods: The study was carried out in the Ege University Medicine Faculty Department of Ophthalmology after obtaining local ethics committee approval. Sixty-two eyes with cataracts and ERM, AMD, or DME that increased retinal thickness were included in the study group. Fifty-four eyes with cataracts and no retinal pathology were included in the control group. Lens power calculations based on measurements obtained with optical and ultrasound biometers were made using the SRK-T, Holladay 2, Hoffer Q, Haigis, and Barrett Universal 2 formulas and the results were compared. Results: In the study group, 31 eyes (50%) had DME, 16 (26%) had AMD, and 15 (24%) had ERM. The mean of arithmetic deviations from target refraction was lowest with the Barrett Universal 2 formula (p>0.05). When the Haigis formula was used, there was a significant deviation in both the study and control groups, while only the control group showed a significant deviation with the Hoffer Q formula (p<0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of absolute deviations (p>0.05). Conclusion: In cataract patients with maculopathy and increased retinal thickness, the likelihood of inaccurate IOL power calculation was lowest with the Barrett Universal 2 and highest with the Haigis formula. These results should be further examined in larger patient series.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.14744/eer.2022.49469
dc.identifier.endpage79en_US
dc.identifier.issn2757-8135
dc.identifier.issn2757-9816
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage75en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1166477en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.14744/eer.2022.49469
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1166477
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/102749
dc.identifier.volume2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean eye researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.snmz20240825_Gen_US
dc.titleComparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in patients with cataract and maculopathyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar