The Effect of Mild Hypocapnia on Postoperative Ecchymosis in Rhinoplasty

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridTurhal, Goksel/0000-0003-0020-1921
dc.authoridBerber, Veysel/0000-0003-0427-2882
dc.authorscopusid56483289600
dc.authorscopusid57188594037
dc.authorscopusid57206479849
dc.authorscopusid36140678800
dc.authorscopusid25651683700
dc.contributor.authorTurhal, Goksel
dc.contributor.authorOzturk, Arin
dc.contributor.authorBerber, Veysel
dc.contributor.authorSergin, Demet
dc.contributor.authorGode, Sercan
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-12T20:03:30Z
dc.date.available2023-01-12T20:03:30Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentN/A/Departmenten_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Ecchymosis and edema are the most common complications in patients following rhinoplasty in the early postoperative period. Vasoconstriction created by hypocarbia may have a positive effect on postoperative ecchymosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of mild hypocapnia induced in rhinoplasty on the severity of periorbital ecchymosis. Methods: The study was carried out retrospectively in the digital photographs (control group and study group) of 31 participants who underwent open technical rhinoplasty between January and March 2019. During the operation, partial carbon dioxide pressure in the study group was kept in the range of 32 to 38 mmHg and in the control group between 42 and 46 mmHg and this was confirmed by arterial blood gas measurements taken during the operation. Measuring the brightness and shadows of digital photos Digital color meter was used in MacOS X as a computer software. Results: The mean ratio of periorbital ecchymosis to forehead brightness was 0.84 +/- 0.05 in the study group and 0.81 +/- 0.03 in the control group. There was no significant difference between the study and control groups (P > .05). Conclusion: This study investigates the potential role of hypocapnia on postoperative ecchymosis during rhinoplasty. The severity of ecchymosis was less in the patients with induced mild hypocapnia regarding both subjective and objective evaluations, but this difference didn't reach statistical significance compared to the normocapnic control group.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/00034894221118452
dc.identifier.issn0003-4894
dc.identifier.issn1943-572X
dc.identifier.pmid35959955en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85135801433en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/00034894221118452
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/77700
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000839875900001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSage Publications Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjecthypocapniaen_US
dc.subjectecchymosisen_US
dc.subjectrhinoplastyen_US
dc.subjectmiscellaneousen_US
dc.subjectseptorhinoplastyen_US
dc.subjectedemaen_US
dc.subjectEdemaen_US
dc.titleThe Effect of Mild Hypocapnia on Postoperative Ecchymosis in Rhinoplastyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu