Eozinofilik ve non-eozinofilik KOAH'lı olguların alevlenmeler, yaşam kalitesi ve tedaviye yanıt açısından karşılaştırılması: Prospektif çalışma
Yükleniyor...
Dosyalar
Tarih
2019
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Ege Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Background And Aım: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous disease consisting of different clinical and pathophysiological components. In the recent years, biomarkers are usually defined as the major determinants of the response to pharmacological therapies. There are some phenotypes of COPD such as:
In eosinophilic COPD pateints; although there is better treatment response to inhaled and systemic steroids; an increase in moderate to severe exacerbation rates have been also reported. In the eosinophilic phenotype; peripheral blood eosinophil level is considered to be positively correlated with sputum eosinophil level. However, there is no enough data showing the clinical features of this eosinophilic phenotype. Therefore; The aim of this study was to compare the differences between eosinohilic and non-eosinophilic COPD pateints in terms of frequency of exacerbations, quality of life, the response to the treatment and also compare the levels of inflammatory biomarkers (C-Reactive Protein, Fibrinogen) among the groups with and without eosinophilia.
Material-Method: Pulmonary functions, symptoms [COPD Evaluation Questionnaire (CAT) and Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC)] were evaluated in patients with stable COPD who presented to our Chest Diseases outpatient clinic; inflammatory biomarkers (C-Reactive Protein, Fibrinogen) sputum and blood eosinophil levels were measured. Patients with sputum eosinophil level ≥ 3%, blood eosinophil level ≥ 2% and ≥ 200 / μL were considered to be eosinophilic. The patients were prospectively followed-up for a 1-year period and the rates of exacerbation and exacerbation were recorded.
Results:
The mean age was 66.5 ± 9.2 years (78%, 82.4%), FEV1 58 ± 19.8%, CAT scores were 12.5 ± 7.2, and mMRC was 1.8 ± 0.8, and peripheral blood eosinophil percentage was 2%. The mean eosinophil count of 6 ± 2 peripheral blood was 237 ± 176 and the sputum eosinophil percentage was 7.2 ± 6.9. High blood eosinophilia in 55.4%, sputum eosinophil level in 52 cases, high sputum eosinophilia in 77%, no correlation was found between blood and sputum eosinophil values (p = 0.129). The number of exacerbations was found to be significantly higher according to blood eosinophil percentage and absolute value (p = 0.029)(figure 1-2). Although sputum eosinophilia was associated with the number of exacerbations in the previous year and the number of exacerbations of follow-up, it was not found statistically significant. (p = 0.250). There was no significant difference in CAT, mMRC, FEV1 variability and inflammatory biomarkers between the eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic groups.
Conclusıons: There was no significant correlation between blood and sputum eosinophil values; The number and severity of exacerbations were higher in COPD patients with absolute value and percentage of blood eosinophils. Therefore, more frequent follow-up is required in cases with eosinophilic phenotype.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Eosinophil, Copd, Exacerbation
