New conduction defects and pacemaker implantation after heart transplantation
dc.contributor.author | Engin C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ertugay S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kemal H.S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Şahin H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Yağdi T. | |
dc.contributor.author | Engin Y. | |
dc.contributor.author | Akdemir I. | |
dc.contributor.author | Nalbantgil S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Özbaran M. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-10-26T21:24:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-10-26T21:24:54Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.department | Ege Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Background: This study aims to determine the incidence of new conduction defects and pacemaker implantation and to identify patient characteristics for a permanent pacemaker need after biatrial orthotopic heart transplantation. Methods: B etween F ebruary 1 998 a nd A ugust 2 014, w e retrospectively analyzed the data of 212 consecutive patients (147 males, 65 females; mean age 39.6±15 years; range 5 to 65 years) who underwent heart transplantation with biatrial cuff technique in our clinic. Baseline characteristics and postoperative data were compared among the patients who required a pacemaker or did not. Results: The incidence of permanent pacing after heart transplantation was 6.4%. The most frequent reason for permanent pacing was symptomatic bradycardia. Previous cardiac surgery was associated with a non-significant trend toward a need for permanent pacing (p=0.056). The presence of a ventricular assist device was a found to be associated with both prolonged temporary and permanent pacemaker requirement after biatrial cardiac transplantation (p=0.021 and p=0.042, respectively). Conclusion: Although bradyarrhythmia and need for temporary pacing were common in the early postoperative period, few of these patients needed permanent pacemaker implantation. The need for a permanent pacemaker seems to be more frequent after challenging operations, such as bridge to heart transplantation with a long-term ventricular assist device. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2015.11889 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 621 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1301-5680 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 617 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2015.11889 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11454/17210 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 23 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | TR-Dizin | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Baycinar Medical Publishing | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Bradycardia | en_US |
dc.subject | Heart transplantation | en_US |
dc.subject | Pacemaker | en_US |
dc.title | New conduction defects and pacemaker implantation after heart transplantation | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |