The best management of superficial bladder tumours: Comparing TUR alone versus TUR combined with intravesical chemotherapy modalities?

dc.contributor.authorAltay B.
dc.contributor.authorGirgin C.
dc.contributor.authorKefi A.
dc.contributor.authorÇikili N.
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-27T00:25:54Z
dc.date.available2019-10-27T00:25:54Z
dc.date.issued2000
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractTo compare retrospectively the recurrence rates of TUR alone versus different intravesical chemotherapy modalities in superficial bladder cancer cases, 187 patients with stage Ta and T1 bladder tumours were treated with transurethral resection followed by adjuvant intravesical chemotherapy with mitomycin, BCG or epirubicin or by transurethral resection alone. All patients in this study had historically proven transurethrally resectable primary, category Ta and T1 transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder. Group I included transurethral resection alone, and the other groups included intravesical mitomycin-C (Group II), BCG (Group III) and epirubicin (Group IV) therapies after transurethral resection. 146 male and 41 female patients (78% male and 22% female patients) in this study were diagnosed as primary TCC bladder tumours. Only 52 of them were stage Ta and 135 of them were stage T1 bladder tumours. Examining the histological grade of the bladder tumours, 88 (47%) of the patients had grade I, 53 (28%) had grade IIa, 30 (16%) had grade IIb and remaining 16 (9%) had grade III bladder cancers. The recurrence rates were 25% for Group I, 23.8% for Group II, 26.2% for Group III and 22.7% for Group IV. These values were given with disregarding the grade and volume of the bladder tumours. For solitary, less than 3 cm low grade tumours (grade I, IIa) recurrence rates were 16% for Group I, 15.4% for Group II, 17.8% for Group III, 17.2% for Group IV (p > 0.05). As a result of this retrospective study, for patients with low grade, stage Ta and T1 tumours TUR alone may be the best treatment modality. Although intravesical chemotherapy is effective in decreasing short-term incidences of tumour recurrence, it has not decreased long-term incidences of tumour recurrence. The high cost and adverse side effects of intravesical chemotherapy should also be taken into consideration in superficial, single, low grade tumours of bladder.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1023/A:1007199932271en_US
dc.identifier.endpage58en_US
dc.identifier.issn0301-1623
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid11057773en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage53en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007199932271
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/23319
dc.identifier.volume32en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Urology and Nephrologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectIntravesical chemotherapyen_US
dc.subjectRecurrence rateen_US
dc.subjectSuperficial bladder tumouren_US
dc.subjectTUR aloneen_US
dc.titleThe best management of superficial bladder tumours: Comparing TUR alone versus TUR combined with intravesical chemotherapy modalities?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar