Bond Strength of Different Dentin Bonding Systems to Fluorotic Enamel

dc.contributor.authorErtugrul, Fahinur
dc.contributor.authorTurkun, Murat
dc.contributor.authorTurkun, L. Sebnem
dc.contributor.authorToman, Muhittin
dc.contributor.authorCal, Ebru
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-27T20:46:56Z
dc.date.available2019-10-27T20:46:56Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The effect of three different bonding strategies on the shear bond strength of a resin composite to fluorotic enamel surfaces was investigated. Materials and Methods: Thirty-six noncarious extracted human molars with fluorosis and 36 without fluorosis were scraped clean from any remaining tissue, and then were divided into three subgroups according to the tested dentin bonding systems. The resin composite was bonded to the teeth using three different adhesive systems: Peak LC Bond with an etch-and-rinse technique (Ultradent Products), Peak LC Bond with a self-etching technique using Peak SE Primer (Ultradent Products), and Xeno V (Dentsply Caulk) using a one-bottle self-etching technique. Following the photopolymerization of the resin composites, thermocycling was performed 5000 times. Shear bond strengths were tested using the Shimadzu Universal Testing Machine until failure. The analysis of the fractured enamel surfaces was performed using an optical microscope (Nikon ECLIPSE ME 600) at 1OX and 1000X magnification, and the images were analyzed with an image analyzer (LUCIA 4.21). The data obtained were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and the Bonferroni test at a significance level of p < 0.05. Results: Mean shear bond strengths in MPa of the groups were: Peak LC Bond, self-etching, on fluorotic enamel 13.23 +/- 2.58 and on nonfluorotic enamel 17.81 +/- 2.90; Peak LC Bond, etch-and-rinse, on fluorotic enamel 16.77 +/- 2.32 and on nonfluorotic enamel 21.13 +/- 2.74; one-bottle self-etching Xeno V on fluorotic enamel 10.79 +/- 2.14 and on nonfluorotic enamel 14.58 +/- 2.99. Conclusion: Fluorosis adversely affected the bonding performance of all the bonding systems to enamel. The use of the etch-and-rinse dentin bonding technique produced higher bond strengths of the resin composite tested to fluorotic and nonfluorotic enamel compared to both self-etching techniques.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage303en_US
dc.identifier.issn1461-5185
dc.identifier.issn1757-9988
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid19701511en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage299en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/42480
dc.identifier.volume11en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000269255600007en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherQuintessence Publishing Co Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Adhesive Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectfluorosisen_US
dc.subjectresin compositesen_US
dc.subjectshear bond strengthen_US
dc.subjectenamel bondingen_US
dc.titleBond Strength of Different Dentin Bonding Systems to Fluorotic Enamelen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar