The effects of two different teaching techniques on the knowledge level of nursing students about HPV

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorDag, Hande
dc.contributor.authorDonmez, Sevgul
dc.contributor.authorSezer, Hale
dc.contributor.authorSendag, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorSevil, Umran
dc.contributor.authorSaruhan, Aynur
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-27T22:27:28Z
dc.date.available2019-10-27T22:27:28Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThis study's purpose is to increase nursing students' knowledge level about HPV and vaccines of HPV, and encourage them to be vaccinated by using two different discussion based teaching techniques. This study performed with 40 volunteer students selected by simple random method by using Scenario Based Learning (SBLT) and Phillips 66 Teaching Techniques (PTT) and pre-post-test quasi-experimental model between 01.09.2013 to 31.01.2014. In data collection, Individual Data Collection Form (IDCF) and Knowledge Level Measurement Questionnaire (KLMQ) were used. Knowledge Retention Test (KRT) was administered to students after 20 days. In data analysing, Chi-square and Fisher's Exact Tests were used. HPV and vaccination knowledge of the students were found 57.5% insufficient and 65% of them not believe the protectiveness of HPV vaccine. There were statistically significant diffence between the students' believe of the protectiveness of HPV vaccine and the desire of them to be vaccinated (p=0.00). There were not any diffence between the techniques' effects on achievement level (AL) of the students after education (p>0.05). But, there were significant diffence between AL of the students before and after the education (p=0.00). There were not any diffence between after the education and KRT AL of the students (p>0.05). 20 days after the education, 87.5% of them believe the protectiveness of HPV vaccine. 85% of them wanted to be vaccinated after the education. These teaching techniques increased students knowledge of HPV, but between them there were not any significant difference. The vaccine protectiveness believes of them and expensiveness of the vaccine effect their vaccination request.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5455/GMJ-30-168267
dc.identifier.endpage98en_US
dc.identifier.issn2564-7784
dc.identifier.issn2564-7040
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage90en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5455/GMJ-30-168267
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/50681
dc.identifier.volume21en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000439230200003en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherAves Press Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Therapeuticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectScenario Based Learningen_US
dc.subjectPhillips 66 Teaching Techniqueen_US
dc.subjecthuman Papilloma virusen_US
dc.subjectnursingen_US
dc.subjectstudenten_US
dc.titleThe effects of two different teaching techniques on the knowledge level of nursing students about HPVen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu