Detection of artificial demineralization bordering different types of laminate veneers using visual inspection and storage phosphor radiography

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorComlekoglu, Erhan
dc.contributor.authorOnem, Erinc
dc.contributor.authorComlekoglu, Mine Dundar
dc.contributor.authorBaksi, B. Guniz
dc.contributor.authorMert, Ali
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-27T21:51:56Z
dc.date.available2019-10-27T21:51:56Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of visual inspection (VI) and storage phosphor plate (SPP) radiography for the detection of artificial demineralization bordering different laminate veneers. Twenty human maxillary canine teeth were prepared. All-ceramic (A) and hybrid ceramic (H) laminate veneers were fabricated and luted. Veneered teeth were covered except for a circular window on the proximal surface bordering restorations. Teeth were kept in acetic acid buffer to create demineralization and imaged with a SPP system. Ten observers evaluated all teeth first visually then with SPP images for the presence/absence of demineralization. Teeth were examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) as well. The accuracy was expressed as the area under the ROC curves (A (z)). Pair-wise comparisons were performed using two-way ANOVA and post hoc t test (p = 0.05). Fleiss kappa (kappa) was used for agreement. SPP radiography was better than the VI for both veneers (p = 0.004). The A (z)s of two veneers were different for both VI (p < 0.005) and SPP (p < 0.005). SEM evaluation revealed lesions confined to enamel. kappa was fair for H, and fair to moderate for A. Agreement was higher for the radiographic evaluation for both veneers. Enamel demineralizations bordering hybrid and ceramic laminate veneers can be detected better with SPP radiography than VI and detectability was better for all-ceramic veneers than the hybrid ceramic ones. Early detection of enamel demineralizations bordering laminate veneers would result in time-saving and less-invasive treatment methods; therefore, SPP radiography may be recommended in clinically suspicious cases since it provides better diagnostic accuracy.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00784-012-0847-5en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1514en_US
dc.identifier.issn1432-6981
dc.identifier.issn1436-3771
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid23053699en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1507en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0847-5
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/47389
dc.identifier.volume17en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000320887800007en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Heidelbergen_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Investigationsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCariesen_US
dc.subjectAdhesive lutingen_US
dc.subjectLaminate veneersen_US
dc.subjectDigital radiographyen_US
dc.titleDetection of artificial demineralization bordering different types of laminate veneers using visual inspection and storage phosphor radiographyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu