Agreement between video-based clinician-rated tools and patient-reported outcomes on gait assessment in individuals with multiple sclerosis

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridEkici, Ece/0000-0002-7985-330X
dc.authoridOzden, Fatih/0000-0001-6593-3758
dc.authorscopusid57208124008
dc.authorscopusid57188881437
dc.authorscopusid58522249500
dc.authorscopusid6603649950
dc.contributor.authorÖzden, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorÖzkeskin, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorEkici, Ece
dc.contributor.authorYüceyar, Nur
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-25T18:46:26Z
dc.date.available2024-08-25T18:46:26Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurposeTo our knowledge, no studies compared the video-clinician-based tools and patient-reported questionnaires in assessing gait and balance in people with MS (pwMS). The present study investigated the correlation and agreement between video-clinician-based objective measurement tools and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in gait and balance evaluation.MethodsA prospective cross-sectional study was conducted with 55 pwMS. Video analysis-based gait was evaluated by the Tinetti Gait Assessment (TGA), Gait Assessment and Intervention Tool (GAIT), and Functional Ambulation Classification Scale (FACS) by the clinician. Participants' self-reported gait and balance were assessed with the Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12 (MSWS-12) and Activity-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC).ResultsThere was a moderate positive correlation between ABC with TGA and FACS (r(1): 0.552, r(2): 0.510, p < 0.001). ABC was strongly correlated with GAIT (r: - 0.652, p < 0.001). A moderate positive correlation was observed between MSWS-12 with TGA and FACS (r(1): - 0.575, r(2): - 0.524, p < 0.001). In addition, there was a strong positive correlation between MSWS-12 and GAIT (r: - 0.652, p < 0.001). Clinician-rated tools and PROMs were within the agreement limits regarding the unstandardized beta values p < 0.001).ConclusionsClinician-based gait and balance tools demonstrate consistent results with PROMs in pwMS. Considering the low cost and practical use of PROMs, in cases where video-based clinician-based measurements cannot be provided (time, space, and technical inadequacies), questionnaires can provide concordant results at moderate and severe levels compared with objective tools.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10072-023-06983-7
dc.identifier.issn1590-1874
dc.identifier.issn1590-3478
dc.identifier.pmid37535127en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85166665340en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-023-06983-7
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/101902
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001042629800002en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlag Italia Srlen_US
dc.relation.ispartofNeurological Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.snmz20240825_Gen_US
dc.subjectConcordanceen_US
dc.subjectMultiple sclerosisen_US
dc.subjectQuestionnairesen_US
dc.subjectWalkingen_US
dc.subjectVideo analysisen_US
dc.subjectReliabilityen_US
dc.subjectWalkingen_US
dc.subjectPeopleen_US
dc.titleAgreement between video-based clinician-rated tools and patient-reported outcomes on gait assessment in individuals with multiple sclerosisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu