Analysis of Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Pyleloplasty for Primary Versus Secondary Repair in 119 Consecutive Cases EDITORIAL COMMENT

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorTurna, Burak
dc.contributor.authorStein, Robert J.
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-27T21:44:14Z
dc.date.available2019-10-27T21:44:14Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.urology.2011.10.074en_US
dc.identifier.endpage694en_US
dc.identifier.issn0090-4295
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid22386424en_US
dc.identifier.startpage694en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2011.10.074
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/47214
dc.identifier.volume79en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000301154400058en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofUrologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğeren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleAnalysis of Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Pyleloplasty for Primary Versus Secondary Repair in 119 Consecutive Cases EDITORIAL COMMENTen_US
dc.typeEditorialen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu