Intra-oral adhesive systems for ceramic repairs: a comparison
dc.contributor.author | Kumbuloglu, O | |
dc.contributor.author | User, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Toksavul, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Vallittu, PK | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-10-27T18:38:18Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-10-27T18:38:18Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2003 | |
dc.department | Ege Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The aim of this investigation was to compare the bond strength of restorative composite resin to dental ceramic conditioned with primers and adhesives of various commercial repair kits. Three intra-oral ceramic repair systems-Silistor (Heraeus Kulzer), Cimara (Voco), Ceramic Repair (Vivadent)-were used on all-ceramic (IPS Empress 2, Ivoclar-Vivadent) substrate. Shear bond strength of restorative composite resin to substrate was tested after thermocycling and without thermocycling (n = 10). Substrate surfaces of the specimen after loading were examined microscopically (SEM). The highest bond strengths in both water-stored (7.0 +/- 5.7 MPa) and thermocycled conditions (2.5 +/- 1.8 MPa) were obtained with the Vivadent repair system, while the lowest values were observed with the Cimara system (0.6 +/- 1.4 MPa and 0.0 +/- 0.0 MPa, respectively). Shear bond strengths appeared to be significantly affected by thermocycling (ANOVA, P< 0.05). It is concluded that there are significant differences in the bond strengths of resin composites and ceramic substrate. The roughened surface does not necessarily provide a better bond strength; the bond strength of composite decreases with storage in water and after thermocycling. Bond strength values were generally low for all of the tested materials. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/00016350310005556 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 272 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0001-6357 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1502-3850 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 5 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 14763777 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 268 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1080/00016350310005556 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11454/36577 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 61 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000187413900003 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q2 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis Ltd | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Acta Odontologica Scandinavica | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | all-ceramics | en_US |
dc.subject | intra-oral repair | en_US |
dc.subject | shear bond strength | en_US |
dc.title | Intra-oral adhesive systems for ceramic repairs: a comparison | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |