Comparative Techno-Economic Study of Solar Thermal Power Plants with Various Capacities: A Case for the Northern Part of Cameroon

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorBiboum, Alain
dc.contributor.authorYılancı, Ahmet
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-12T20:30:09Z
dc.date.available2023-01-12T20:30:09Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentN/A/Departmenten_US
dc.description.abstractCameroon, located in the Sub-Saharan Africa, has a good direct normal irradiation value of about 2145 kWh/m2/year, but it has a population living with less than 10% electrification rate in the rural area. The purpose ofthis study is to evaluate the commercial use of three different solar thermal power technologies (Parabolictrough collector, PTC; Solar Tower, ST; Linear Fresnel, LF) with various capacities (5 MWe, 10 MWe, 50 MWe,100 MWe) in the northern part of Cameroon. A techno-economic analysis which uses technical, economicand financial parameters is conducted for each technology, so it is able to give options to investors/designersfor evaluating such kind of technologies. In this study, some parameters such as total annual direct normalirradiation (DNI) values received by solar field, thermal output of the solar field, thermal system transfer rate,overall energy efficiency and annual electricity production are considered for the technical analysis. Also,economic and financial results such as payback period (PBP), internal rated return (IRR), net present value (NPV)and levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) are found out during the economic analysis. Moreover, environmentaland social impact assessment (ESIA) study is considered as a key parameter for multi-criteria decision analysis.It is obtained that costs per kW for the solar thermal power plants vary between 4550-6745 USD, 5240-9365USD and 5100-6290 USD for PTC, ST and LF, respectively. Levelized cost of electricity values are calculatedbetween 10.22-13.22 USDcents/kWh, 11.07-19.81 USDcents/kWh and 14.63-15.60 USDcents/kWh for PTC,ST and LF technologies, respectively. ST technology is not efficient compared to others for less than 10 MWedue to its high initial investment cost. It is important to note that cost per kW in the sub-Saharan region is highbecause of high transportation fees, lack of solar thermal manufactures for insulation-piping systems and metalstructures, and high indirect costs such as engineering, procurement, construction and advanced ESIA services.Financial support mechanisms for such technologies such as tax exemptions, incentives and subventions basedon carbon pricing approach can decrease considerably both payback periods and total costs of the systems, andcontribute to developing the sector by creating an attractive solar thermal power market.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.26701/ems.493214
dc.identifier.endpage22en_US
dc.identifier.issn2587-1110
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage12en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid338420en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.26701/ems.493214
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/338420
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/80733
dc.identifier.volume4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Mechanical Scienceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleComparative Techno-Economic Study of Solar Thermal Power Plants with Various Capacities: A Case for the Northern Part of Cameroonen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu