Percutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Retrospective Study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorHarman, Ferhat
dc.contributor.authorAydin, Seckin
dc.contributor.authorSencan, Savas
dc.contributor.authorAkdeniz, Esra
dc.contributor.authorGuvenc, Yahya
dc.contributor.authorSaracoglu, Ayten
dc.contributor.authorGunduz, Osman Hakan
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-01T12:05:06Z
dc.date.available2020-12-01T12:05:06Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAIM: To evaluate the outcomes of percutaneous spinal cord stimulation (PSCS) in patients with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) in an academic tertiary care center. MATERIAL and METHODS: the hospital records of patients with FBSS who had undergone PSCS were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 19 patients with FBSS matched the search criteria, and among them, 16 were included in the study, in whom permanent implantable pulse generators (IPGs) were implanted. Demographic, clinical and surgical outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Twelve (75%) women and 4 (25%) men with a median age of 50 years (range, 35-80 years) were analysed. the average number of surgeries before PSCS was 1.6 +/- 1.2 (range, 1-4). Pain was localised in the back and leg in 81.25% of the patients. the mean duration of symptoms was 6.3 +/- 3.1 years (range, 2-10 years). the mean length of trial period was 16.3 +/- 6.8 days (range, 7-29 days). in this study, the permanent implantation rate was 84.2% (16/19). the mean follow-up time was 18.3 +/- 3.9 months (range, 14-26 months). Postoperative back/leg numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) score was significantly lower than preoperative back/leg NPRS score (p<0.001). the postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score was significantly lower than the preoperative ODI score (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: PSCS is a safe and effective treatment method for patients with FBSS. in this study, the high rate of improvement in the outcome scores may be attributed to the small sample size and early PSCS implantation.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipTurkish Neurosurgical Societyen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipPreparation for publication of this article is partly supported by Turkish Neurosurgical Society.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.30598-20.2en_US
dc.identifier.endpage745en_US
dc.identifier.issn1019-5149
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid32705670en_US
dc.identifier.startpage739en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.30598-20.2
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/62880
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000574422300015en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTurkish Neurosurgical Socen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Neurosurgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectFailed back surgery syndromeen_US
dc.subjectChronic painen_US
dc.subjectSpinal cord stimulationen_US
dc.subjectMinimally invasive surgeryen_US
dc.titlePercutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Retrospective Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu