Effect of an antibacterial adhesive on the bond strength of three different luting resin composites

dc.contributor.authorCal, Ebru
dc.contributor.authorTuerkuen, L. Sebnem
dc.contributor.authorTuerkuen, Murat
dc.contributor.authorToman, Muhittin
dc.contributor.authorToksavul, Suna
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-27T19:17:58Z
dc.date.available2019-10-27T19:17:58Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Effect of a dentin adhesive system containing antibacterial monomer-MDPB (Clearfil Protect Bond) on the shear bond strength of all-ceramic-IPS Empress 2 restorations luted with three different dual-polymerizing systems (Variolink 2, RelyX ARC and Panavia F 2.0) to dentin was investigated. Methods: One hundred and eight all-ceramic discs (2X3 mm; IPS Empress 2) were fabricated and ultrasonically cleaned. The buccal surfaces of 108 non-carious extracted human premolars were flattened to expose dentin and subsequently polished with 600-grit wet silicon carbide paper. Three dual-polymerizing luting systems had test groups and control groups consisting of 18 samples each. For the test groups Clearfil Protect Bond was applied to the exposed dentin surfaces. Control groups received the original bonding procedures of each adhesive system. After the all-ceramic samples were luted to the teeth, thermocycling was performed 5000 times. Shear bond strengths were tested using Shimadzu Universal Testing Machine until failure. Analysis of fractured dentin surfaces were performed using Optical Microscope at X 10 and X 1000 magnifications and the images were analyzed with Image Analyzer. Data was analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni test at a significance [eve( of p<0.05. Results: Mean shear bond strength data of the groups in MPa were; Variolink: 20.45+/-4.75, Variolink+Clearfil Protect Bond: 29.32 +/- 2.37, RelyX ARC:18.82 +/- 3.19, RelyXARC+Clearfil Protect Bond: 25.58 +/- 4.05, Panavia F2.0:17.11 +/- 2.98, Panavia F 2.0+Clearfil Protect Bond: 24.40 +/- 7.46. Application of the antibacterial adhesive increased the shear bond strengths of all three dual-polymerizing systems to dentin (p=0.00). The surface analysis showed that most of the specimens showed the adhesive failure mode between the dentin and the composite luting agent interface. Conclusion: The antibacterial adhesive system Clearfil Protect Bond can be safety used to prevent the potential risk of complications resulting from bacterial. activity regardless of affecting the bond strength of IPS Empress 2 restorations luted with the dual-polimerizing systems used in this study. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jdent.2005.08.004en_US
dc.identifier.endpage380en_US
dc.identifier.issn0300-5712
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid16288949en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage372en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.08.004
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/38517
dc.identifier.volume34en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000239495800002en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Sci Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectantibacterial adhesiveen_US
dc.subjectluting resin compositesen_US
dc.subjectEmpress 2en_US
dc.subjectshear bond strengthen_US
dc.titleEffect of an antibacterial adhesive on the bond strength of three different luting resin compositesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar