YouTube (TM) as an information source for regenerative endodontic treatment procedures: Quality and content analysis

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridGuneri, Pelin/0000-0001-9423-9191
dc.authorscopusid56018968300
dc.authorscopusid57006676100
dc.authorscopusid57212216594
dc.authorscopusid26656974500
dc.authorscopusid54881967500
dc.authorscopusid55889800200
dc.authorscopusid7005185606
dc.contributor.authorKaval, Mehmet Emin
dc.contributor.authorDemirci, Gozde Kandemir
dc.contributor.authorAtesci, Alp Abidin
dc.contributor.authorSarsar, Firat
dc.contributor.authorDindaroglu, Furkan
dc.contributor.authorGueneri, Pelin
dc.contributor.authorCaliskan, Mehmet Kemal
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-12T19:55:02Z
dc.date.available2023-01-12T19:55:02Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentN/A/Departmenten_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) are one of the most important developments in dental practice, and in the era of Covid 19 pandemic, audio-visual contents of YouTube (TM) could be an information source for dental students, practitioners and patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality, content and the demographics of YouTube (TM) videos about REPs. Methods: A search on YouTube (TM) was performed for REPs using endodontic regeneration, pulp regeneration, regenerative endodontics, regenerative endodontic procedures, revascularization and revitalization keywords. Totally 531 videos were found and 60 videos met the inclusion criteria. Following the assessment of the demographic features of the videos and the viewing rate of the videos were calculated. The content of the videos was evaluated based on the selected headings. The quality of the videos was assessed using the video information, quality index (VIQI), Global Quality Score (GQS) and DISCERN. The statistical analysis was performed using Spearman Correlation and linear regression analysis. Results: Majority of the videos about REPs were created by dental professionals (91.7%). The most commonly covered topic was clinical application (76.7%). Total content score showed a positive correlation with total VIQI (r = 0.795; p < 0.001) and GQS (r = 0.952; p < 0.001). There were significant relationships between total content score, duration, GQS, total VIQI score and DISCERN. Conclusion: The findings revealed that YouTube (TM) videos about REPs provide predominantly clinical information about patient chairside practice of REPs and they could be considered as a supplementary information source for dental students and practitioners.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104732
dc.identifier.issn1386-5056
dc.identifier.issn1872-8243
dc.identifier.pmid35240558en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85125466947en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104732
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/76597
dc.identifier.volume161en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000790935000003en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ireland Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Medical Informaticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_US
dc.subjectOnline educationen_US
dc.subjectRegenerative endodonticsen_US
dc.subjectRevascularizationen_US
dc.subjectYouTube (TM)en_US
dc.titleYouTube (TM) as an information source for regenerative endodontic treatment procedures: Quality and content analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu