Vertebral augmentation in osteoporotic spine fractures: WFNS Spine Committee recommendations

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid36106450200
dc.authorscopusid57226517101
dc.authorscopusid26436305900
dc.authorscopusid7004827180
dc.authorscopusid56021763700
dc.contributor.authorSharif, Salman
dc.contributor.authorAli, Muhammad Y.
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Francesco
dc.contributor.authorZileli, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorParthiban, Jutty
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-12T20:12:05Z
dc.date.available2023-01-12T20:12:05Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentN/A/Departmenten_US
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to formulate the WFNS Spine Committee guidelines on indications. outcomes, and complications of vertebral augmentation in osteoporotic spine fractures. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Computerized literature was searched from 2010 to 2021 using keywords vertebral augmentation, osteoporotic fracture, technique, surgery, complication, and outcome. PubMed yielded 92 articles whereas Google scholar resulted in 120 articles. 29 articles were studied in detail. The studies comprised of seventeen RCT's, two prospective non-randomized studies, three retrospective studies, and seven systematic reviews. The statements were produced to reach a consensus in two separate meetings of WFNS Spine Committee. The statements were voted and reached a positive or negative consensus using Delphi method. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Drafted statements on Vertebral Augmentation in osteoporotic Spine Fractures were voted upon by expert panelists in Virtual WFNS Spine Committee Consensus Meetings conducted on January 11, 2021, and February 13, 2021. Statements reaching positive consensus provided the basis for the WFNS guidelines regarding vertebral augmentation in osteoporotic spine fractures. CONCLUSIONS: WFNS Spine Committee recommendations on vertebral augmentation in osteoporotic spine fractures are summarized in this article. Vertebral augmentation is superior to conservative treatment for vertebral osteoporotic fractures but has conflicting results on comparison with placebo. Both vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are equally effective. Most of the studies regarding the efficacy of vertebral augmentation procedures to reduce pain have been largely inconclusive. It is suggested that further high quality, better designed randomized controlled studies are required to establish the role of vertebral augmentation in spine osteoporotic compression fractures.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.23736/S0390-5616.22.05642-9
dc.identifier.endpage326en_US
dc.identifier.issn0390-5616
dc.identifier.issn1827-1855
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid36153881en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85138572672en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage311en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.22.05642-9
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/78243
dc.identifier.volume66en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000891143000005en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEdizioni Minerva Medicaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Neurosurgical Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğeren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectSpineen_US
dc.subjectOsteoporotic fracturesen_US
dc.subjectVertebroplastyen_US
dc.subjectKyphoplastyen_US
dc.subjectConservative treatmenten_US
dc.subjectCompression Fracturesen_US
dc.subjectPercutaneous Vertebroplastyen_US
dc.subjectConservative Treatmenten_US
dc.subjectCement Augmentationen_US
dc.subjectRandomized-Trialen_US
dc.subjectFollow-Upen_US
dc.subjectBalloon Kyphoplastyen_US
dc.subjectOutcomesen_US
dc.subjectPedicleen_US
dc.subjectVolumeen_US
dc.titleVertebral augmentation in osteoporotic spine fractures: WFNS Spine Committee recommendationsen_US
dc.typeReviewen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu