Can Reduced-Step Polishers Be as E'ective as Multiple-STep Polishers in Enhancing Sur-ace Smoothness?

dc.contributor.authorKemaloglu, Hande
dc.contributor.authorKaracolak, Gamze
dc.contributor.authorTurkun, L. Sebnem
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-27T11:22:20Z
dc.date.available2019-10-27T11:22:20Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of various finishing and polishing systems on the final surface roughness of a resin composite. Hypotheses tested were: (I) reduced-step polishing systems are as effective as multiple-step systems on reducing the surface roughness of a resin composite and (2) the number of application steps in an F/P system has no effect on reducing surface roughness. Materials and Methods: Ninety discs of a nano-hybrid resin composite were fabricated and divided into nine groups (n = 10). Except the control, all ofthe specimens were roughened prior to be polished by: Enamel Plus Shiny Venus Supra,One-gloss, Sof-Lex Wheels, Super-Snap, Enhance/PoGo,Clearfil TNist Dia, and rubber cups.The surface roughness was measured and the surfaces were examined under scanning electron microscope. Results were analyzed with analysis of variance and Holm-Sidak's multiple comparisons test (p < Results: Significant differences were found among the surface roughness of all groups (p < 0.05).The smoothest surfaces were obtained under Mylar strips and the results were not differentthan Super-Snap, Enhance/PoGo, and Sof-Lex Spiral Wheels. I he group that showed the roughest surface was the rubber cup group and these results were similar to those ofthe One-gloss, Enamel Plus Shiny, and Venus Supra groups. Conclusions: (I) The number of application steps has no effect on the performance of F/P systems. (2) Reduced-step polishers used after a finisher can be preferable to multiple-step systems when used on nanohybrid resin composites. (3) The effect of F/P systems on surface roughness seems to be material-dependent rather than instrument- or system-dependent.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jerd.12233en_US
dc.identifier.endpage40en_US
dc.identifier.issn1496-4155
dc.identifier.issn1708-8240
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid27393008en_US
dc.identifier.startpage31en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12233
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/33020
dc.identifier.volume29en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000396375000004en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleCan Reduced-Step Polishers Be as E'ective as Multiple-STep Polishers in Enhancing Sur-ace Smoothness?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar