Can Reduced-Step Polishers Be as E'ective as Multiple-STep Polishers in Enhancing Sur-ace Smoothness?
dc.contributor.author | Kemaloglu, Hande | |
dc.contributor.author | Karacolak, Gamze | |
dc.contributor.author | Turkun, L. Sebnem | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-10-27T11:22:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-10-27T11:22:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.department | Ege Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of various finishing and polishing systems on the final surface roughness of a resin composite. Hypotheses tested were: (I) reduced-step polishing systems are as effective as multiple-step systems on reducing the surface roughness of a resin composite and (2) the number of application steps in an F/P system has no effect on reducing surface roughness. Materials and Methods: Ninety discs of a nano-hybrid resin composite were fabricated and divided into nine groups (n = 10). Except the control, all ofthe specimens were roughened prior to be polished by: Enamel Plus Shiny Venus Supra,One-gloss, Sof-Lex Wheels, Super-Snap, Enhance/PoGo,Clearfil TNist Dia, and rubber cups.The surface roughness was measured and the surfaces were examined under scanning electron microscope. Results were analyzed with analysis of variance and Holm-Sidak's multiple comparisons test (p < Results: Significant differences were found among the surface roughness of all groups (p < 0.05).The smoothest surfaces were obtained under Mylar strips and the results were not differentthan Super-Snap, Enhance/PoGo, and Sof-Lex Spiral Wheels. I he group that showed the roughest surface was the rubber cup group and these results were similar to those ofthe One-gloss, Enamel Plus Shiny, and Venus Supra groups. Conclusions: (I) The number of application steps has no effect on the performance of F/P systems. (2) Reduced-step polishers used after a finisher can be preferable to multiple-step systems when used on nanohybrid resin composites. (3) The effect of F/P systems on surface roughness seems to be material-dependent rather than instrument- or system-dependent. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/jerd.12233 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 40 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1496-4155 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1708-8240 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 27393008 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 31 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12233 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11454/33020 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 29 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000396375000004 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q3 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.title | Can Reduced-Step Polishers Be as E'ective as Multiple-STep Polishers in Enhancing Sur-ace Smoothness? | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |