Analysis of Factors Affecting Functional Outcomes in Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorKızılay, Fuat
dc.contributor.authorİsmaylov, Fuad
dc.contributor.authorŞimşir, Adnan
dc.contributor.authorTurna, Burak
dc.contributor.authorSemerci, Bülent
dc.contributor.authorApaydın, Erdal
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-01T12:32:58Z
dc.date.available2020-12-01T12:32:58Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractbjective: in addition to ensuring cancer control, prevention of incontinence and erectile dysfunction, which significantly impact patients’ quality of life, is also an important issue in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) operations. in this study, we aimed to evaluate the factors affecting postoperative urinary continence and erectile function in patients who underwent RALRP due to localized prostate cancer in our clinic. Materials and Methods: Our study included 439 patients who were diagnosed with stage 1 prostate cancer and underwent RALRP. Patients’ age, preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value, prostate volume, radical prostatectomy material Gleason score, operative time, transperitoneal surgical approach (posterior or anterior), and surgical margin and extraprostatic extension statuses were recorded. Postoperative continence and erectile function status of the patients were questioned and recorded via telephone interviews and in outpatient clinic follow-up. Patients were divided into groups according to postoperative incontinence and erectile dysfunction status and the variables were compared between the groups. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the continent and incontinent groups in terms of age, preoperative PSA, prostate volume, operative time, postoperative Gleason score, surgical margin status, extraprostatic extension status, or anterior or posterior approach (p>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups with and without erectile dysfunction in terms of prostate volume, operative time, postoperative Gleason score, surgical margin status, or extraprostatic extension status (p>0.05), while there were statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of age (p<0.001), preoperative PSA value (p=0.042), and surgical technique (p<0.001). Conclusion: We concluded that patient- and disease-related factors did not significantly affect postoperative urinary continence in patients undergoing RALRP due to prostate cancer, while patient age, preoperative PSA value, and operative technique had a significant effect on erectile function.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4274/uob.1006
dc.identifier.endpage88en_US
dc.identifier.issn2147-2122
dc.identifier.issn2147-2270
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage84en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4274/uob.1006
dc.identifier.urihttps://app.trdizin.gov.tr//makale/TXpBMU9ETXlNZz09
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/66410
dc.identifier.volume17en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofÜroonkoloji Bültenien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectOnkolojien_US
dc.subjectÜroloji ve Nefrolojien_US
dc.titleAnalysis of Factors Affecting Functional Outcomes in Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu