Assessment of anaesthesia and anaesthetist through the patients' point of view
Küçük Resim Yok
Tarih
2000
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Hastaların: anestezistin cerrahi girişimlerdeki rolüne ilişkin bilgilerinin, beklentilerinin, anestezi ekibince sunulan sağlık hizmetinin kalitesine yönelik yorumlarının soruşturulması amacıyla 239 hastaya 36 sorudan oluşan bir anket uygulandı. Hastaların 219'una preoperatif vizit uygulanmış olmasına karşın, bunların 165'i olası anestezi risklerinden yeterince bilgilendirilmediklerini ifade ettiler. Hastaların çoğunun uyanamamaktan ya da girişime neden olan primer patolojileri ile ilgili kötü bir prognozdan korktukları belirlendi. Genel olarak hastaların perioperatif dönemde verilen sağlık hizmetine yönelik bir eleştiri getirmeyip, memnun oldukları saptandı. Bu çalışmadan elde edilen verilere dayanılarak, anestezi kalitesinin korunması için, postanestezik hasta izlenimlerine dayandırılan değerlendirmelerin yarar sağlayacağı sonucuna varıldı.
Two hundred and thirty-nine patients were interviewed by a questionnaire comprising 36 questions, to evaluate the patients' knowledge about the anaesthetist, their expectations and satisfactions, their main fears about the anaesthesia and surgery and their perception of the service provided by the anaesthesia team. Although 219 patients had been visited preoperatively, 166 of them considered that they had been insufficiently warned of possible anaesthetic events. Most of the patients were afraid of not waking up or of expectation of poor prognosis related to the primary pathologies which led to the procedure. In general, patients stated that they were satisfied and made no criticisms to the health service performed during the perioperative period. Based on the data received from this study, it is concluded that in order to maintain the quality of anaesthesia, the evaluations related on the postoperative patient impressions will be advantageous.
Two hundred and thirty-nine patients were interviewed by a questionnaire comprising 36 questions, to evaluate the patients' knowledge about the anaesthetist, their expectations and satisfactions, their main fears about the anaesthesia and surgery and their perception of the service provided by the anaesthesia team. Although 219 patients had been visited preoperatively, 166 of them considered that they had been insufficiently warned of possible anaesthetic events. Most of the patients were afraid of not waking up or of expectation of poor prognosis related to the primary pathologies which led to the procedure. In general, patients stated that they were satisfied and made no criticisms to the health service performed during the perioperative period. Based on the data received from this study, it is concluded that in order to maintain the quality of anaesthesia, the evaluations related on the postoperative patient impressions will be advantageous.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Cerrahi
Kaynak
Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
14
Sayı
2
