Is Manual Segmentation the Real Gold Standard for Tooth Segmentation? A Preliminary in vivo Study Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography Images
dc.authorid | Boyacioglu, Hayal/0000-0003-0887-0302 | |
dc.authorid | SABANCI, SERCAN/0000-0002-0699-307X | |
dc.contributor.author | Sabanci, Sercan | |
dc.contributor.author | Sener, Elif | |
dc.contributor.author | Turhal, Rukiye Irmak | |
dc.contributor.author | Gurses, Baris Oguz | |
dc.contributor.author | Govsa, Figen | |
dc.contributor.author | Tekin, Ugur | |
dc.contributor.author | Baltaci, Aysun | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-12T20:16:46Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-01-12T20:16:46Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.department | N/A/Department | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: This study aimed to assess whether manual segmentation is an accurate method in tooth volume measurement and to compare the outcomes of manual, automatic, and semiautomatic segmentations on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images by comparing each system with the water displacement method, which is the gold standard. Materials and Methods: CBCT images of l0 maxillary impacted teeth were used in this preliminary in vivo study. Following the acquisition of CBCT scans, manual, automatic, and semiautomatic segmentations were completed by the same operator. After surgical removal, the volumes of all impacted teeth were measured with the water displacement method, which was used as the gold standard. The volume of each segmented image was measured in mm(3) using the 3D-Doctor software. The established volumes of each segmented image were compared with those of the gold standard using the 95% confidence interval bootstrap percentiles. Intraobserver reliability was determined using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Results: All segmentation methods revealed significantly different volume values both from the gold standard and from each other (p=0.000). The semiautomatic segmentation demonstrated comparable performance with the manual method, and both systems provided comparable volumes with the gold standard than did the automatic method. Excellent intra-observer intraclass correlations were found for all protocols. Conclusion: The actual volumes of the specimen were not obtained by manual, semiautomatic, and automatic segmentations. Semiautomatic segmentation demonstrated comparable performance to the manual method, whereas automatic segmentation yielded the poorest values. The automatic and semiautomatic segmentations may be improved by the development and utilization of novel or hybrid segmentation algorithms for a faster process and more accurate results. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Ege University [17-DIS-015] | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | This study was funded by Ege University with Scientific Research project number: 17-DIS-015. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.4274/meandros.galenos.2021.14632 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 273 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2149-9063 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 263 | en_US |
dc.identifier.trdizinid | 503150 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.4274/meandros.galenos.2021.14632 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/503150 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11454/78770 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 22 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000697234000007 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | N/A | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | TR-Dizin | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Galenos Yayincilik | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Meandros Medical And Dental Journal | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Cone-beam computed tomography | en_US |
dc.subject | image analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | segmentation | en_US |
dc.subject | impacted tooth | en_US |
dc.subject | Volumetric Measurement | en_US |
dc.subject | Teeth | en_US |
dc.subject | Validation | en_US |
dc.subject | Accuracy | en_US |
dc.subject | Autotransplantation | en_US |
dc.subject | Cysts | en_US |
dc.subject | Ct | en_US |
dc.title | Is Manual Segmentation the Real Gold Standard for Tooth Segmentation? A Preliminary in vivo Study Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography Images | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |