Comparison of Culture-Positive and -Negative Microbial Keratitis
dc.authorid | Palamar, Melis/0000-0002-2494-0131 | |
dc.authorid | SELVER, OZLEM BARUT/0000-0003-3333-3349 | |
dc.authorid | Hilmioglu Polat, Suleyha/0000-0001-8850-2715 | |
dc.authorid | Egrilmez, Sait/0000-0002-6971-527X | |
dc.authorid | Aydemir, Sabire Sohret/0000-0001-8354-9100 | |
dc.authorscopusid | 57225917267 | |
dc.authorscopusid | 24077472700 | |
dc.authorscopusid | 23989747000 | |
dc.authorscopusid | 6602843026 | |
dc.authorscopusid | 8905840200 | |
dc.authorscopusid | 56088640300 | |
dc.authorscopusid | 7003943383 | |
dc.authorwosid | Palamar, Melis/H-5903-2013 | |
dc.authorwosid | SELVER, OZLEM BARUT/N-5108-2019 | |
dc.authorwosid | Egrilmez, Sait/P-7923-2015 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yarimada, Semir | |
dc.contributor.author | Selver, Ozlem Barut | |
dc.contributor.author | Palamar, Melis | |
dc.contributor.author | Egrilmez, Sait | |
dc.contributor.author | Aydemir, Sabire Sohret | |
dc.contributor.author | Polat, Suleyha Hilmioglu | |
dc.contributor.author | Yagci, Ayse | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-12T20:16:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-01-12T20:16:56Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.department | N/A/Department | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: To evaluate and compare the risk factors, presenting features, and outcomes of patients with culture-positive and culture-negative microbial keratitis (MK) who presented to a tertiary referral center. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of 314 patients who were diagnosed with MK in our clinic between 2012 and 2019. Results: Among 314 patients, 142 had positive cultures (45.2%). The mean ages of the culture-positive and-negative patients at the time of diagnosis were 51.39 +/- 21.31 (range, 14-90) years and 56.68 +/- 21.34 (7-94) years, respectively (p=0.028). The mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of the culture-positive and-negative patients were1.74 +/- 1.25 (0-3.1) LogMAR and 1.91 +/- 1.23 (0-3.1) LogMAR prior to treatment and increased to 1.21 +/- 1.30 (0-3.1) LogMAR and 1.27 +/- 1.29 (0-3.1) LogMAR at last visit, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between culture-positive and-negative patients' BCVA levels at presentation or last visit. Ninety-two patients (64.7%) were infected with bacteria and 50 patients (35.2%) with fungi. The most common pathogen was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (18.3%), followed by Streptococcus pneumoniae (11.2%) and Fusarium spp. (11.2%). Keratitis foci were either centrally or paracentrally located in 105 eyes (73.9%) of culture-positive patients and 149 eyes (86.6%) of culture-negative patients. Multiple foci were present mostly in culture-positive patients (p=0.001). There was no significant difference between the culture-positive and-negative groups in terms of hypopyon presence (p=0.364). The proportion of contact lens (CL) wearers was 33% (n=47) among culture-positive MK patients and 13.3% (n=23) among culture-negative MK patients, respectively (p<0.001). Culture positivity was found to be significantly higher in keratitis associated with CL use (p=0.0001). Conclusion: Microbiological analysis and culture evaluation are important steps in order to manage proper treatment in microbial keratitis. Prognosis mostly depends on the infectivity of the microbiological agent. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2021.98046 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 5 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1300-0659 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2147-2661 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 35196833 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85125214149 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | N/A | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2021.98046 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11454/78794 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 52 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000761159800002 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | N/A | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Turkish Ophthalmological Soc | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Turk Oftalmoloji Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Contact lens | en_US |
dc.subject | culture | en_US |
dc.subject | microbial keratitis | en_US |
dc.subject | Bacterial Keratitis | en_US |
dc.subject | Predisposing Factors | en_US |
dc.subject | Referral Center | en_US |
dc.subject | Risk-Factors | en_US |
dc.subject | Experience | en_US |
dc.subject | Diagnosis | en_US |
dc.subject | Features | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of Culture-Positive and -Negative Microbial Keratitis | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |