Comparison of scanning electron microscopy findings regarding biofilm colonization with microbiological results in nasolacrimal stents for external, endoscopic and transcanalicular dacryocystorhinostomy

dc.contributor.authorBalikoglu-Yilmaz, Melike
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Tolga
dc.contributor.authorCetinel, Sule
dc.contributor.authorTaskin, Umit
dc.contributor.authorEsen, Ayse Banu
dc.contributor.authorTaskapili, Muhittin
dc.contributor.authorKose, Timur
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-27T22:14:25Z
dc.date.available2019-10-27T22:14:25Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAIM: To compare bacterial biofilm colonization in lacrimal stents following external dacryocystorhinostomy (EX DCR), endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EN-DCR), and transcanalicular dacryocystorhinostomy (TC-DCR) with multidiode laser. METHODS: This prospective study included 30 consecutive patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction who underwent EXT-, EN-, or TC-DCR. Thirty removed lacrimal stent fragments and conjunctival samples were cultured. The lacrimal stent biofilms were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). RESULTS: ElevEN-(36.7%) of the 30 lacrimal stent cultures were positive for aerobic bacteria (most commonly Staphylococcus spia'arrniokS and Pseudomonas aeruginosa). However anaerobic bacteria and fungi were not identified in the lacrimal stent cultures. Twenty sevEN-(90%) patients had biofilm positive lacrimal stents. The conjunctival culture positivity after the DCR, biofilm positivity on stents, the grade of biofilm colonization, and the presence of mucus and coccoid and rod shaped organisms did not significantly differ betweEN-any of the groups (P>0.05). However, a significant difference was found whEN-the SEM results were compared to the results of the lacrimal stent and conjunctival cultures (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Type of dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) surgery did not affect the biofilm colonization of the lacrimal stents. SEM also appears to be more precise than microbiological culture for evaluating the presence of biofilms on lacrimal stents.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipInstitutional Review Board of Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, TurkeyIstanbul Bagcilar Training & Research Hospital [1852]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSupported by Institutional Review Board of Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (No.1852)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.03.27en_US
dc.identifier.endpage540en_US
dc.identifier.issn2222-3959
dc.identifier.issn2227-4898
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid24967205en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage534en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.03.27
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/50001
dc.identifier.volume7en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000337658400027en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIjo Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Ophthalmologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectbiofilmsen_US
dc.subjectnasolacrimal duct obstructionen_US
dc.subjectepiphoraen_US
dc.subjectdacryocystitisen_US
dc.subjectscanning electron microscopyen_US
dc.titleComparison of scanning electron microscopy findings regarding biofilm colonization with microbiological results in nasolacrimal stents for external, endoscopic and transcanalicular dacryocystorhinostomyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar