Two years survival rate of class II composite resin restorations prepared by ART with and without a chemomechanical caries removal gel in primary molars

dc.contributor.authorTopaloglu-Ak, Asli
dc.contributor.authorEden, Ece
dc.contributor.authorFrencken, Jo E.
dc.contributor.authorOncag, Ozant
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-27T20:46:12Z
dc.date.available2019-10-27T20:46:12Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim was to test the null hypotheses that there is no difference: (1) in carious lesion development at the restoration margin between class II composite resin restorations in primary molars produced through the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) with and without a chemomechanical caries removal gel and (2) in the survival rate of class II composite resin restorations between two treatment groups after 2 years. Three hundred twenty-seven children with 568 class II cavitated lesions were included in a parallel mouth study design. Four operators placed resin composite (Filtek Z 250) restorations bonded with a self-etch adhesive (Adper prompt L pop). Two independent examiners evaluated the restorations after 0.5, 1, and 2 years using the modified Ryge criteria. The Kaplan-Meier survival method was applied to estimate survival percentages. A high proportion of restorations were lost during the study period. Therefore, the first hypothesis could not be tested. No statistically significant difference was observed between the cumulative survival percentages of restorations produced by the two treatment approaches over the 2-year period (ART, 54.1 +/- 3.4%; ART with Carisolv (TM), 46.0 +/- 3.4%). This hypothesis was accepted. ART with chemomechanical gel might not provide an added benefit increasing the survival percentages of ART class II composite resin restorations in primary teeth.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00784-008-0241-5en_US
dc.identifier.endpage332en_US
dc.identifier.issn1432-6981
dc.identifier.issn1436-3771
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid19101739en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage325en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-008-0241-5
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/42364
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000269373500012en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Heidelbergen_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Investigationsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAtraumatic restorative treatmenten_US
dc.subjectComposite resinen_US
dc.subjectPrimary molarsen_US
dc.subjectchemomechanical caries removal gelen_US
dc.subjectAdper prompt L popen_US
dc.titleTwo years survival rate of class II composite resin restorations prepared by ART with and without a chemomechanical caries removal gel in primary molarsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar