Evaluation and comparison of root resorption between tooth-borne and tooth-tissue borne rapid maxillary expansion appliances: A CBCT study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorDindaroglu, Furkan
dc.contributor.authorDogan, Servet
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-27T22:58:27Z
dc.date.available2019-10-27T22:58:27Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare volumetric root resorption after rapid maxillary expansion (RME) between tooth-borne and tissue-borne appliances using CBCT. Repair in resorption cavities after 6 months of fixed retention was also compared. Materials and Methods: A sample of 33 subjects were randomly divided into two groups: Hyrax (n = 16) and Haas (n = 17). CBCT scans were taken 6 months before expansion, immediately after expansion, and 6 months after fixed retention. Mimics Innovation V 16.0 software was used for segmentation and volumetric measurement of 198 teeth. Bland-Altman plots, independent samples ttest, repeated measures analysis of variance, and the Friedman test were used for statistical analysis. Results: Differences in root resorption after RME and repair after retention were not significant between the hyrax and Haas appliances or between male and female. Significant differences were found between preexpansion and postexpansion root volumes in the first premolars and molars even in unattached second premolars. When the percentage of root volume loss is considered, no significant difference was found between the first premolar, second premolar, and first molar. Volumetric changes after 6 months of retention were not statistically significant. Conclusions: More resorption was observed in the Hyrax expander group. But it was not statistically significant. Repair was observed after 6 months of retention. Heavy RME forces affected premolars and molar similarly.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2319/010515-007.1en_US
dc.identifier.endpage52en_US
dc.identifier.issn0003-3219
dc.identifier.issn1945-7103
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid25993251en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage46en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2319/010515-007.1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/51551
dc.identifier.volume86en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000367495200007en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherE H Angle Education Research Foundation, Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAngle Orthodontisten_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectRoot resorptionen_US
dc.subjectCBCTen_US
dc.subjectSegmentationen_US
dc.titleEvaluation and comparison of root resorption between tooth-borne and tooth-tissue borne rapid maxillary expansion appliances: A CBCT studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu