Evaluation of Postoperative Pain Following Single-Visit Root Canal Treatment with Rotary and Reciprocal Ni-Ti File Systems in Children

dc.authoridTopaloglu-Ak, Asli/0000-0003-4572-1875
dc.authoridAtesci, Alp/0000-0001-6346-3801
dc.authorscopusid57212216594
dc.authorscopusid15763645200
dc.authorscopusid57403829500
dc.authorscopusid6603641813
dc.authorscopusid56018968300
dc.authorwosidKaval, Mehmet Emin/AAH-7302-2020
dc.contributor.authorAtesci, Alp Abidin
dc.contributor.authorTopaloglu-Ak, Asli
dc.contributor.authorTuran, Ece
dc.contributor.authorOncag, Ozant
dc.contributor.authorKaval, Mehmet Emin
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-12T20:15:40Z
dc.date.available2023-01-12T20:15:40Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentN/A/Departmenten_US
dc.description.abstractBackground and Objectives: Postoperative pain is a common symptom of a flare-up after root canal treatments (RCTs). Insufficient instrumentation, extrusion of irrigation solutions and debris, and the existence of a periapical lesion are the factors affecting postoperative pain after root canal treatments. The aim of this study was to evaluate the postoperative pain and instrumentation time of the single-file reciprocating system and multiple-file Ni-Ti rotary system in children ages 9-12 years old. Materials and Methods: Our study was conducted on 51 permanent mandibular molars with the diagnosis of irreversible pulpitis. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups, and RCTs were completed with either the Reciproc Blue or Protaper NEXT file systems. Instrumentation time for each system was noted, and patients were given a pain scale that included a visual analog scale for 6, 24, 48, and 72 h after treatment. Postoperative pain scores and instrumentation times were analyzed statistically with a chi-square test and Student's t-test. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative pain between the Reciproc Blue and Protaper NEXT systems at all time intervals. Instrumentation time was significantly shorter in the Reciproc Blue group in comparison with the Protaper NEXT group. Conclusions: Postoperative pain findings following RCT using single-file reciprocating systems were similar to the rotary system group. However, chair time in the reciprocating system group was significantly lower. This provided a comfortable and patient-friendly treatment approach for children, and could enhance their cooperation.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEge University Research Project Fund [16-DIS-013]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipFundingThis research project was funded by the Ege University Research Project Fund (16-DIS-013).en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/medicina58010050
dc.identifier.issn1010-660X
dc.identifier.issn1648-9144
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid35056358en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85122471732en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58010050
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/78543
dc.identifier.volume58en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000746011900001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMdpien_US
dc.relation.ispartofMedicina-Lithuaniaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectpostoperative painen_US
dc.subjectroot canal treatmenten_US
dc.subjectreciprocating motionen_US
dc.subjectrotary motionen_US
dc.subjectDifferent Instrumentation Techniquesen_US
dc.subjectApical Extrusionen_US
dc.subjectEndodontic Treatmenten_US
dc.subjectFlare-Upen_US
dc.subjectDebrisen_US
dc.subjectTeethen_US
dc.subjectHanden_US
dc.subjectPeriodontitisen_US
dc.subjectPrevalenceen_US
dc.subjectIntensityen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Postoperative Pain Following Single-Visit Root Canal Treatment with Rotary and Reciprocal Ni-Ti File Systems in Childrenen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar