Comparison of mycobacteria growth indicator tube with BACTEC 460 for detection and recovery of mycobacteria from clinical specimens
dc.contributor.author | Badak F.Z. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kiska D.L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Setterquist S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Hartley C. | |
dc.contributor.author | O'Connell M.A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Hopfer R.L. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-10-27T00:32:45Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-10-27T00:32:45Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1996 | |
dc.department | Ege Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | We compared the Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) system with the BACTEC 460 (B460) and Lowenstein Jensen (LJ) systems for the recovery of mycobacteria (acid-fast bacteria [AFB]) from 1,441 clinical specimens. Excluding 13 isolates of Mycobacterium gordonae, 178 significant AFB isolates were recovered from 113 patients. Isolates (119) of the Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) accounted for 67% of all isolates, while isolates (30) of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTB) accounted for 17% of isolates. The MGIT system recovered 98 (82%) MAC and 27 (90%) MTB isolates, while the B460 system recovered 101 (85%) MAC and 28 (93%) MTB isolates and the LJ system recovered 91 (76%) MAC and 25 (83%) MTB isolates. Overall, the MGIT system recovered 152 isolates of AFB (85.4% sensitivity), and the B460 and LJ systems recovered 151 (84.8% sensitivity) and 137 (76.9% sensitivity) AFB isolates, respectively. The recoveries of AFB with combinations of media were as follows: MGIT + LJ, 93.2%; B460 + LJ, 92.1%; and MGIT + B460, 96.6%. Although the sensitivity of MGIT was equivalent to that of B460, MGIT required a longer incubation (median, 11 days) than did B460 (median, 8 days) to become positive (P < 0.05). | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 2239 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0095-1137 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 9 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 8862591 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | N/A | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 2236 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11454/23882 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 34 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Clinical Microbiology | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of mycobacteria growth indicator tube with BACTEC 460 for detection and recovery of mycobacteria from clinical specimens | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |