Microleakage of Indirect Composite Resin Luted WithDifferent Adhesive Cements

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorÇömlekoğlu, Mine Dündar
dc.contributor.authorPaken, Gamze
dc.contributor.authorSonugelen, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorTürkün, Şebnem
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-12T20:37:22Z
dc.date.available2023-01-12T20:37:22Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentN/A/Departmenten_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate the influence of different adhesive cements on the microleakage of proximal surfaces in class II indirectcomposite resin restorations. Material and methods: Twenty-four human extracted caries-free third molars were selected. Standard class II cavities were preparedon the mesial and distal surfaces with margins located above the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). Cavities were standardized by fixingthe handpiece in a parallelometer during preparation. Treatment groups were divided into 4 cements: GCem LinkAce (GCm) (GC,Japan), Panavia F 2.0 (P) (Kuraray, Japan), RelyX U200 (Rx) (3M ESPE, USA), Superbond C&B (SB) (SunMedical, Japan) andcontrol (V) (Variolink II, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein). In each tooth, the mesial cavity was set as the experimental and thedistal as a control. Restorations were fabricated with an indirect composite resin (Gradia; GC, Japan) and luted into cavities.Specimens were thermocycled (5-55Cº,5000 cycles) and immersed in 50% silver nitrate solution for 24 hours. The teeth weresectioned mesiodistally and evaluated for microleakage using digital image analysis (24x; Leica optical microscope, Germany). Theordinal scale used was: 0-4 (0= no microleakage and 4= dye penetration along axial wall). Mean values for each group were recordedand statistically analyzed using Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test. (alpha=0,05) Results: There were no significant differences among occlusal microleakage of all groups (GCm:0; P: 0,17±.0,4; Rx:0 andSB:0,17±.0,4) (P>0,05). The least microleakage (?m±SD) was recorded for GCm and Rx self-adhesive cements for occlusal (0.00;0,00) and gingival (0,83±0,4; 0,50±0,5) parts, respectively. The highest microleakage was noted with SB and P at the gingival parts(2,0±1,4; 1,5±0,84), respectively and the difference was significant compared to the other groups (P<0,05).Conclusions: Tested self-adhesive dual-curing resin cements exhibited simulated long-term microleakage stability while self-curingresin cement yielded highest microleakage..en_US
dc.identifier.endpage94en_US
dc.identifier.issn1302-7476
dc.identifier.issn1300-3038
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage88en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid484361en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/484361
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/81660
dc.identifier.volume42en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEge Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleMicroleakage of Indirect Composite Resin Luted WithDifferent Adhesive Cementsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu