Assessment of the validity and reliability of a novel dental trauma index

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridkaval, mehmet emin/0000-0003-2388-2846
dc.authoridAtesci, Alp Abidin/0000-0001-6346-3801
dc.authoridBoyacioglu, Hayal/0000-0003-0887-0302
dc.authorscopusid56018968300
dc.authorscopusid57212216594
dc.authorscopusid57385321400
dc.authorscopusid6507789361
dc.authorscopusid7004743247
dc.contributor.authorKaval, Mehmet Emin
dc.contributor.authorAtesci, Alp Abidin
dc.contributor.authorKurt, Seniha Senem Micoogullari
dc.contributor.authorBoyacioglu, Hayal
dc.contributor.authorEden, Ece
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-25T18:47:29Z
dc.date.available2024-08-25T18:47:29Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground/AimsTraumatic dental injuries (TDI) are one of the most commonly encountered dental health complications. In order to standardize the evaluations and compare the findings of TDI, a carefully defined dental trauma index may serve as a good tool for the correct recording of dental trauma. A new dental trauma index, the Modified Eden & Baysal dental trauma index (MEBTI), has been introduced. It is an expanded index to record soft tissue injuries in addition to dental injuries. The aim of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the MEBDTI. Materials and MethodsThe archival data of 20 patients with different traumatic injuries were selected. A web-based form including the radiographs and photographs of selected cases was created. Following a training session, 12 dentists with a minimum of 10 years of clinical experience were asked to score the cases using the MEBDTI on an online form. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to test the normality. The Kruskal-Wallis Test was used for intergroup comparisons. Inter-observer agreement was investigated by reliability analysis. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate the agreement among observers. The Chi-Square test of independence was used to determine if there is a significant relationship between two nominal variables (p < .05). ResultsThe rate of correctly assessing the alveolar bone fracture was 96.9% followed by apex maturity (92.7%), root fracture (85.4%), luxation injury (76.5%), crown fracture (76.2%), and soft tissue injury (50%). Considering all parameters, the soft tissue injuries were statistically different in terms of the answers given by the 12 dentists (p < .05). ConclusionThe accuracy of the scores of participants was high and in accordance with each other except for the identification of soft tissue injuries. In favor of this novel index, the data on dental trauma cases could be recorded practically and reliably.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/edt.12830
dc.identifier.issn1600-4469
dc.identifier.issn1600-9657
dc.identifier.pmid36779687en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85148897178en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12830
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/101912
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000939615200001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofDental Traumatologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.snmz20240825_Gen_US
dc.subjectEden Baysal dental trauma indexen_US
dc.subjectreliabilityen_US
dc.subjecttraumatic dental injuriesen_US
dc.subjectvalidityen_US
dc.subjectInjuriesen_US
dc.subjectEpidemiologyen_US
dc.titleAssessment of the validity and reliability of a novel dental trauma indexen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu