Assessment of the canal anatomy of the premolar teeth in a selected Turkish population: a cone-beam computed tomography study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid56458426500
dc.authorscopusid57191289824
dc.authorscopusid15135403600
dc.authorscopusid57132368000
dc.authorscopusid57193708883
dc.contributor.authorErkan, Erhan
dc.contributor.authorOlcay, Keziban
dc.contributor.authorEyuboglu, Tan Firat
dc.contributor.authorSener, Elif
dc.contributor.authorGundogar, Mustafa
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-25T18:46:06Z
dc.date.available2024-08-25T18:46:06Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackgroundTeeth may have additional roots and a different number of root canals. Overlooked root canals may cause endodontic failure. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of root canals and the number of roots of premolars in a selected Turkish population.Materials and methodsA total of 2,570 teeth from 1,438 patients were evaluated. The cone-beam computed tomography scans of 1,055 maxillary and 1,515 mandibular premolars were examined.ResultsType IV root canal morphology was observed most frequently in maxillary first premolars (77%), and the rates of single and double channel formations were very similar (51% and 49%, respectively). Of the second maxillary premolars, 57.4% had Type I morphology, and 89.9% of the teeth were single-rooted, while 68.6% had a single root canal. The most common formation was Type I (85%) among mandibular first premolars, and a single root was observed in 95.6% of these teeth. In addition, 87% of the mandibular first premolars had a single root canal. The second mandibular premolars mostly had Type I (95.4%) formation, and 99.3% of the teeth were single-rooted, while 96.9% had a single root canal.ConclusionAccording to our findings, 51% of maxillary first premolars had a single root, 79.4% had two root canals, and 77% had Type IV (77%) formation. Maxillary second premolars mostly had Type I formation. In addition, a single root and single root canal formation were most common. Mandibular first premolars generally had a single root and single root canal formation, but 13% had two root canals, and 6.4% had Type V formation. More than 95% of mandibular second premolars had Type I formation.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12903-023-03107-7
dc.identifier.issn1472-6831
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid37337200en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85162270680en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03107-7
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/101803
dc.identifier.volume23en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001008679200001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBMCen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBmc Oral Healthen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.snmz20240825_Gen_US
dc.subjectMaxillary premolarsen_US
dc.subjectMandibular premolarsen_US
dc.subjectCone-beam CTen_US
dc.subjectRoot canal morphologyen_US
dc.subjectHuman Permanent Teethen_US
dc.subjectMandibular Premolarsen_US
dc.subjectMaxillary 1sten_US
dc.subject2nd Premolarsen_US
dc.subjectRoot Anatomyen_US
dc.subjectMorphologyen_US
dc.subjectSubpopulationen_US
dc.subjectFormen_US
dc.titleAssessment of the canal anatomy of the premolar teeth in a selected Turkish population: a cone-beam computed tomography studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu