Comparison of the success of histopathological diagnosis with dilatation-curettage and Pipelle endometrial sampling

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorKazandi, M.
dc.contributor.authorOkmen, F.
dc.contributor.authorErgenoglu, A. M.
dc.contributor.authorYeniel, A. O.
dc.contributor.authorZeybek, B.
dc.contributor.authorZekioglu, O.
dc.contributor.authorOzdemir, N.
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-27T21:40:55Z
dc.date.available2019-10-27T21:40:55Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study is to compare collection of sufficient material and diagnostic accuracy of Pipelle biopsy with curettage and hysterectomy. A total of 82 cases with indications for endometrial biopsy for any reason and in which endometrial biopsy was performed with dilatation and curettage (D&C) and Pipelle aspiration biopsy, and 66 cases in which an indication for hysterectomy was established for any reason were included in the study. Histopathological findings were examined in the following six groups: normal; endometrial polyps; hyperplasia without atypia; hyperplasia with atypia; atrophy; and insufficient material. Descriptive statistical methods and McNemar's test were used. When the histopathological compatibility between Pipelle and D&C was considered (n = 82), a diagnosis that was different from that obtained by D&C was obtained in 22 of the 63 cases (34%), in whom normal endometrial histology was found with a Pipelle biopsy specimen. It was observed that only 1 of 13 cases of endometrial polyps was diagnosed with Pipelle biopsy. Insufficient material was obtained in six cases (7%) with Pipelle biopsies and three cases (4%) with D&C. While Pipelle biopsies and D&C have a nearly equal level of success in widespread endometrial lesions, Pipelle biopsies provide limited diagnostic accuracy in cases with focal pathologies.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3109/01443615.2012.719944en_US
dc.identifier.endpage794en_US
dc.identifier.issn0144-3615
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.pmid23075358en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage790en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3109/01443615.2012.719944
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/46447
dc.identifier.volume32en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000309935900020en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInforma Healthcareen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAccuracyen_US
dc.subjectdilatation and curettage (D&C)en_US
dc.subjectendometrial samplingen_US
dc.subjecthysterectomyen_US
dc.subjectPipelleen_US
dc.titleComparison of the success of histopathological diagnosis with dilatation-curettage and Pipelle endometrial samplingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu