The psychometric properties of the Turkish version of myocardial infarction dimensional assessment scale (MIDAS) [Miyokart enfarktüsü boyutsal degerlendirme ölçegi (MIDAS) türkçe sürümünün psikometrik özellikleri]

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz E.
dc.contributor.authorEser E.
dc.contributor.authorŞekuri C.
dc.contributor.authorKültürsay H.
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-27T08:33:41Z
dc.date.available2019-10-27T08:33:41Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The purpose of this study was to describe the psychometric properties of the Myocardial Infarction Dimensional Assessment Scale (MIDAS). Methods: This is a methodological cultural adaptation study. The MIDAS consists of 35-items covering seven domains: physical activity, insecurity, emotional reaction, dependency, diet, concerns over medication, and side effects which are rated on a five-point Likert scale from 1: never to 5:always. The highest score of MIDAS is 100.Quality of life (QOL) decreases as the score of scale increases. Overall 185 myocardial infarction (MI) patients were enrolled in this study. Cronbach alpha was used for the reliability analysis. The criterion validity, structural validity, and sensitivity analysis approach was used for validity analysis. New York Heart Association (NYHA) and the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Functional Classifications (CCSFC) for testing the criterion validity; SF-36 for construct validity testing of the Turkish version of the MIDAS were used. Results: The range of Cronbach alpha values is 0.79-0.90 for seven domains of the scale. No problematic items were observed for the entire scale. Medication related domains of the MIDAS showed considerable floor effects (35.7%-22.7%). Confirmatory Factor analysis indicators [Comparative Fit Index (CFI)=0.95 and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA)=0.075] supported the construct validity of MIDAS. Convergent validity of the MIDAS was confirmed with correlation of SF-36 scale where appropriate. Criterion validity results was also satisfactory by comparing different stages of the NYHA and the CCSFC (p<0.05). Conclusion: Overall results revealed that Turkish version of the MIDAS is a reliable and valid instrument. (Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 2011; 11: 386-401) Copyright 2011 by AVES Yayincilik Ltd.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/akd.2011.105en_US
dc.identifier.endpage401en_US
dc.identifier.issn1302-8723
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid21652294en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage386en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5152/akd.2011.105
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/26849
dc.identifier.volume11en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectMyocardial infarctionen_US
dc.subjectPsychometric propertiesen_US
dc.subjectQuality of lifeen_US
dc.subjectReliabilityen_US
dc.subjectTurkishen_US
dc.subjectValidityen_US
dc.titleThe psychometric properties of the Turkish version of myocardial infarction dimensional assessment scale (MIDAS) [Miyokart enfarktüsü boyutsal degerlendirme ölçegi (MIDAS) türkçe sürümünün psikometrik özellikleri]en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu