Tensile Bond Strength of an Aged Resin Composite Repaired with Different Protocols

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorCelik, Esra Uzer
dc.contributor.authorErgucu, Zeynep
dc.contributor.authorTurkun, L. Sebnem
dc.contributor.authorErcan, Utku Kursat
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-27T21:37:21Z
dc.date.available2019-10-27T21:37:21Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the effect of different surface treatments and bonding procedures on the tensile bond strength (TBS) of resin composites repaired 6 months after polymerization. Materials and Methods: Resin composite sticks were aged in distilled water at 37 C for 6 months. They were divided into 12 groups (n = 10) according to the combination of surface treatment/bonding procedures [none, only bur treatment, XP Bond (XPB/Dentsply/DeTrey) with/without bur, AdheSE (A-SE/Ivoclar/Vivadent) with/without bur, Composite Primer (CP/GC) with/without bur, CP after bur and acid-etching, XPB after acid etching and CP with bur, A-SE after bur and CP]. The ultimate tensile bond strength (UTS) of the resin composites was tested in intact but aged specimens. Tensile bond strengths were tested with a universal testing machine (Shimadzu). Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Duncan Multiple Comparisons tests (p < 0.05). Results: All repaired groups showed significantly higher TBS than the group without any surface treatment (p < 0.05). Four groups resulted in TBS similar to those of intact resin composite UTS: A-SE, A-SE with bur, A-SE after CP with bur, and XPB after acid etching+CP with bur. Conclusion: Bur treatment, silane primer or etch-and-rinse adhesive application alone were not successful in the repair process of aged resin composite, whereas self-etching adhesive alone showed similar performance to the intact specimens. Combined procedures generally showed better performance: A-SE with bur, A-SE after CP with bur, and XPB after acid etching +CP with bur showed TBS similar to those of the intact specimens. It was concluded that bur roughening of the surfaces and rebonding procedures were essential for repairing aged resin composites.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3290/j.jad.a19651en_US
dc.identifier.endpage366en_US
dc.identifier.issn1461-5185
dc.identifier.issn1757-9988
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid20978641en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage359en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a19651
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/46206
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000294079200008en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherQuintessence Publishing Co Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Adhesive Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectcomposite repairen_US
dc.subjectsilane primeren_US
dc.subjectself-etching adhesiveen_US
dc.subjectetch-and-rinse adhesiveen_US
dc.subjectsurface treatmenten_US
dc.titleTensile Bond Strength of an Aged Resin Composite Repaired with Different Protocolsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu