Lens on International Clinical Supervision: Lessons Learned from a Cross-National Comparison of Supervision

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorFalender, Carol
dc.contributor.authorGoodyear, Rodney
dc.contributor.authorDuan, Changming
dc.contributor.authorAl-Darmaki, Fatima
dc.contributor.authorBang, Keeyeon
dc.contributor.authorCiftci, Ayse
dc.contributor.authorKagnici, D. Yelda
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-03T20:21:34Z
dc.date.available2021-05-03T20:21:34Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractClinical supervision is an essential mechanism for training psychologists internationally. But although it is performed globally, scholarship has primarily addressed it through the lens of Western supervision practices. The authors of this manuscript aspired to an alternative lens, that of enlightened globalization (Kim and Park in Korea J 44(2):30-51, 2007), to compare supervision practices in the U.S. and six countries that have been less studied-China, Guatemala, Mexico, South Korea, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates. Although the Guidelines for Supervision of Health Service Psychologists (American Psychological Association [APA] in , 2014, Am Psychol 70(1):33-46, 2015) provided the framework for examining cross-national practices, they were not imposed as standards for all but rather as a springboard for inquiry. The final comparisons addressed areas of regulation and supervisor competence, ethical and legal factors, supervisory multicultural factors, the supervisory relationship, supervisees with problems of professional competence, and assessment, evaluation, and feedback. Cultural differences identified include forms of communication (direct, implicit, explicit), the supervision hierarchy, manifestations of respect, power, and the cultural relevance of regulation, gatekeeping, evaluation, and feedback. The article concludes by using the results of these analyses to propose a definition of clinical supervision that could be appropriate for all seven countries and presumably most other countries as well.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10879-021-09497-5
dc.identifier.issn0022-0116
dc.identifier.issn1573-3564
dc.identifier.issn0022-0116en_US
dc.identifier.issn1573-3564en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85103181348en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-021-09497-5
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/69380
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000630843700001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer International Publishing Agen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Contemporary Psychotherapyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectClinical supervisionen_US
dc.subjectMulticultural supervisionen_US
dc.subjectInternational supervisionen_US
dc.subjectGlobal supervisionen_US
dc.subjectSupervisor competenceen_US
dc.titleLens on International Clinical Supervision: Lessons Learned from a Cross-National Comparison of Supervisionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu