Comparison of emotion elicitation methods: 3 methods, 3 emotions, 3 measures

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridKaça, Gülin/0000-0001-5621-8621
dc.authoridBAYAZIT, Turan Onur/0000-0002-7761-2617
dc.authoridBoga, Merve/0000-0001-6784-4900
dc.authorscopusid57219854987
dc.authorscopusid36084972300
dc.authorscopusid35364075000
dc.authorscopusid25225327100
dc.authorwosidKaça, Gülin/W-3061-2017
dc.authorwosidBAYAZIT, Turan Onur/O-1137-2015
dc.contributor.authorBoga, Merve
dc.contributor.authorKoyuncu, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorKaca, Gulin
dc.contributor.authorBayazit, Turan Onur
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-12T19:51:27Z
dc.date.available2023-01-12T19:51:27Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentN/A/Departmenten_US
dc.description.abstractVarious emotion elicitation methods are used in many studies assessing the interaction of emotion and cognition. However, most of the experimental and meta-analysis studies comparing emotion elicitation methods have examined the success of emotion evoking in terms of valence and arousal. There are few experimental studies dealing with comparisons within discrete emotion approach. The present study was mainly aimed to determine the most effective emotion elicitation method for discrete emotions. Therefore, three emotion elicitation methods (film, IAPS, imagery) used to evoke three discrete emotions (fear, disgust, happiness) were examined in the framework of discrete, dimensional, and response component model of emotion. Within-subject design was used to examine the coherence of emotional response components such as subjective experience, facial expression, and physiological responses. The results suggested that film was the most effective among all emotion elicitation methods. All emotions elicited using the film method were accompanied not only by intense subjective experiences but also by physiological responses. IAPS and imagination methods successfully elicited subjective experiences of all emotions, except for fear - IAPS condition. Besides all, there was a lack of coherence between the components of emotional responses, and the most explicit results were obtained from subjective experiences.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEge University, Scientific Research Center, Projects Coordination Unit [15-EDB-022, 16-EDB-019]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by Projects 15-EDB-022 and 16-EDB-019 at Ege University, Scientific Research Center, Projects Coordination Unit.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12144-022-02984-5
dc.identifier.issn1046-1310
dc.identifier.issn1936-4733
dc.identifier.issn1046-1310en_US
dc.identifier.issn1936-4733en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85127563694en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02984-5
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/76275
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000780767300002en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofCurrent Psychologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectEmotion elicitationen_US
dc.subjectDiscrete emotionsen_US
dc.subjectFilmen_US
dc.subjectIAPSen_US
dc.subjectImaginationen_US
dc.subjectFilmen_US
dc.subjectCoherenceen_US
dc.subjectMetaanalysisen_US
dc.subjectAssociationen_US
dc.subjectExperienceen_US
dc.subjectPhysiologyen_US
dc.subjectResponsesen_US
dc.subjectBehavioren_US
dc.subjectImageryen_US
dc.subjectTexten_US
dc.titleComparison of emotion elicitation methods: 3 methods, 3 emotions, 3 measuresen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu