EFFECT OF INSTRUMENT ASSISTED SOFT TISSUE MOBILIZATION IN PATIENTS WITH CERVICAL DISC HERNIATION : A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridŞenocak, Emre/0000-0003-3677-9813
dc.contributor.authorAlgantekin, Yasin
dc.contributor.authorOzkeskin, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorAkturk, Adem
dc.contributor.authorSenocak, Emre
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-31T07:47:11Z
dc.date.available2024-08-31T07:47:11Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The effects of Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) on cervical disc herniation (CDH) have not been extensively studied. The study aimed to investigate the effect of the IASTM technique on pain, functionality and psychology in CDH. Methods: A two-armed randomized controlled trial was carried out with 24 patients with CDH. Participants were randomized into two groups: conventional physiotherapy (n=12) and IASTM plus conventional physiotherapy (n=12). A conventional rehabilitation consists of a hot pack, electrotherapy, and exercises five days a week for four weeks. IASTM technique has been used for two sessions per week for four weeks. Patients were assessed with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale (CNFDS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Results: Both groups had improvements in VAS scores (p<0.05). IASTM group yielded more reduction in resting and activity pains (p( resting) =0.001, p( activity) =0.001). Disability scores of both groups improved (p<0.05). However, no difference was encountered between the groups regarding function and disability (p>0.05). Both the intervention and control groups showed a decrease in anxiety and depression symptoms (p<0.05). The anxiety and depression score of the intervention group yielded better results than the control group (p<0.05). Conclusion: IASTM improved patients' rest and activity pain, anxiety and depression symptoms. On the other hand, IASTM provided advancement on function and disability scores simply as effective as conventional physiotherapy.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.30621/jbachs.1283363
dc.identifier.endpage335en_US
dc.identifier.issn2458-8938
dc.identifier.issn2564-7288
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage327en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.30621/jbachs.1283363
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/104315
dc.identifier.volume8en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001262739800013en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherDokuz Eylul Univ Inst Health Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.snmz20240831_Uen_US
dc.subjectAnxietyen_US
dc.subjectCervical Painen_US
dc.subjectDisabilityen_US
dc.subjectInstrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilizationen_US
dc.titleEFFECT OF INSTRUMENT ASSISTED SOFT TISSUE MOBILIZATION IN PATIENTS WITH CERVICAL DISC HERNIATION : A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu