Comparison of two different enteral nutrition protocol in critically ill patients

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorBüyükçoban S.
dc.contributor.authorAkan M.
dc.contributor.authorKoca U.
dc.contributor.authorEğlen M.Y.
dc.contributor.authorÇiçeklioğlu M.
dc.contributor.authorMavioğlu Ö.
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-27T08:20:26Z
dc.date.available2019-10-27T08:20:26Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: In this study, two enteral nutrition protocols with different gastric residual volumes (GRVs) and different monitoring intervals were compared with respect to gastrointestinal intolerance findings in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Methods: The study was carried out prospectively in 60 patients in the anaesthesiology and reanimation ICU under mechanical ventilation support, who were scheduled to take enteral feeding. Patients were sequentially divided into two groups: Group 1, GRV threshold of 100 mL, and monitoring interval of 4 hours, and Group 2, GRV threshold of 200 mL, monitoring interval of 8 hours. To test the significant difference between the groups, Student’s t test, chi-square text and Fisher exact test were used. Results: In Group 1, 3.3% vomiting, 6.6% diarrhoea was observed; in Group 2, 16.6% vomiting, 10% diarrhoea. In terms of total intolerance (vomiting and/or diarrhoea) of the two groups, the incidence was significantly higher in Group 2 (33.3%) than in Group 1 (10%) (p=0.02). Conclusion: According to the results of the study, a lower gastrointestinal intolerance rate was detected in the GRV threshold 100 mL, monitoring interval for 4 hours protocol (Group 1) than in GRV threshold 200 mL, monitoring interval for 8 hours protocol (Group 2); Group 1 may be preferred renovation. © 2016 by Turkish Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Society.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/TJAR.2016.92499
dc.identifier.endpage269en_US
dc.identifier.issn1304-0871
dc.identifier.issn1304-0871en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage265en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5152/TJAR.2016.92499
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/25652
dc.identifier.volume44en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAVES Ibrahim Karaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurk Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Dernegi Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCritical ill patienten_US
dc.subjectEnteral nutritionen_US
dc.subjectGastric residual volumeen_US
dc.subjectIntensive care uniten_US
dc.titleComparison of two different enteral nutrition protocol in critically ill patientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu