CLARIFYING THE EUTOPIA ARGUMENT: A RESPONSE TO JOHN CAIAZZA

dc.contributor.authorMarangudakis, Manussos
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-27T21:41:33Z
dc.date.available2019-10-27T21:41:33Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe eutopia vision of the future, promulgated by technoscientists and libertarian thinkers, could herald the coming of a third axial age that could reshape and reformulate the legacy of the Great Religions and their transcendental moral imperatives, and of Modernity and the democratic imperative of equality of social conditions. A sociological diagnosis of a third, technosomatic, morality, is not a matter of supporting or rejecting such a possibility, but a matter of detecting its rise and regulating its impact.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1467-9744.2012.01321.x
dc.identifier.endpage130en_US
dc.identifier.issn0591-2385
dc.identifier.issn0591-2385en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage128en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2012.01321.x
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/46692
dc.identifier.volume48en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000315405400010en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen_US
dc.relation.ispartofZygonen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectbioethicsen_US
dc.subjectbiotechnologyen_US
dc.subjectChristianityen_US
dc.subjectcultural evolutionen_US
dc.subjectselfen_US
dc.titleCLARIFYING THE EUTOPIA ARGUMENT: A RESPONSE TO JOHN CAIAZZAen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar