The buccal fat pad flap for the reconstruction of intraoral buccal defects following buccal cancer surgery

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridOzturk, Kerem/0000-0003-4608-6105
dc.authoridTurhal, Goksel/0000-0003-0020-1921
dc.authorscopusid37089441300
dc.authorscopusid56483289600
dc.authorscopusid57214522614
dc.authorwosidOzturk, Kerem/GNP-2835-2022
dc.contributor.authorOzturk, Kerem
dc.contributor.authorTurhal, Goksel
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Fetih Furkan
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-12T19:54:21Z
dc.date.available2023-01-12T19:54:21Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentN/A/Departmenten_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: There are many reconstruction techniques for the repair of the intraoral buccal defects following oncological resections. The pedicled buccal fat pad (BFP) flap can be used for reconstruction of medium-sized buccal defects. The purpose of this study was to investigate the outcomes of the reconstruction with BFP flap following the resection of buccal tumors and risk factors on BFP flap success. Methods: This study was designed as a retrospective case series research. Ten patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the buccal mucosa underwent BFP flap reconstruction following tumor resection. The dimensions of the primary tumor and post-resection defect were calculated. The intraoral operation field was evaluated on the postoperative 7th day and in the postoperative 1 st and 6th months. Postoperative flap status, disease recurrence, risk factors for flap success were assessed. Results: The mean greatest dimension of the post-resection buccal defect was 41.9 +/- 10.3 mm. A partial dehiscence was observed in three patients in the postoperative 7th day. The 6th month-examination revealed no flap complications. The mean greatest dimension of post-resection buccal defect in uncomplicated patients was 42.7 +/- 11.4 mm and in patients with partial dehiscence was 40 +/- 8.6 mm (p = 0.727). There was no significant difference between uncomplicated patients and patients with partial dehiscence according to body mass index (normal vs overweight, p = 0.667). Conclusion: The BFP flap is a reliable reconstruction method in medium sized buccal defects following oncological resection. It has low complication and donor site morbidity rates and also good anatomical and oncological outcomes. (C) 2021 Asian AOMS, ASOMP, JSOP, JSOMS, JSOM, and JAMI. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ajoms.2021.05.005
dc.identifier.endpage23en_US
dc.identifier.issn2212-5558
dc.identifier.issn2212-5566
dc.identifier.issn2212-5558en_US
dc.identifier.issn2212-5566en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85109800094en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage19en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoms.2021.05.005
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/76390
dc.identifier.volume34en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000719472200003en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery Medicine And Pathologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectBuccal fat paden_US
dc.subjectBuccal fat pad flapen_US
dc.subjectBuccal carcinomaen_US
dc.subjectOral defect reconstructionen_US
dc.subjectOral Defectsen_US
dc.subjectClosureen_US
dc.subjectCarcinomaen_US
dc.subjectHeaden_US
dc.subjectSiteen_US
dc.titleThe buccal fat pad flap for the reconstruction of intraoral buccal defects following buccal cancer surgeryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu