Postoperative objective and subjective voice analysis in patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy and carotid body tumor resection

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid57189350968
dc.authorscopusid40661114300
dc.authorscopusid37016923400
dc.authorscopusid22955926600
dc.authorscopusid35564501000
dc.contributor.authorKahraman, U.
dc.contributor.authorBalcioglu, O.
dc.contributor.authorErtugay, S.
dc.contributor.authorOguz, E.
dc.contributor.authorPosacioglu, H.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-25T18:51:51Z
dc.date.available2024-08-25T18:51:51Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAim: This study aimed to compare voice changes after Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and Glomus body tumor resection with objective instrumental and acoustic assessments. Material and Methods: A total of 14 patients underwent CEA or glomus carotid tumor resection at our institution between 2009 and 2013. Among the 14 patients, two patients were excluded due to vocal cord paralysis. This study was applied to 12 patients. Patients were called retrospectively, and objective and subjective voice parameters were measured and compared. Voice handicap index was used to measure subjective voice parameters. Objective voice analysis was performed for patients by using Multi-dimensional voice programming (MDVP), a computer-aided program. Results: A total of 12 patients were included in the study. Five patients underwent carotid endarterectomy. Glomus tumor resection was performed on seven patients. Of the patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy, four were male and one was female. Three of the patients who underwent glomus tumor resection were male and four were female. Voice handicap index (VHI) showed that two patients who underwent glomus tumor resection experienced moderate problems and the patients who underwent CEA had no obvious problems. Patients who underwent glomus carotid tumor resection obtained higher values in all MDVP parameters than those who underwent CEA. Conclusion: Despite the small number of patients, it can be said that glomus tumor resection in neck surgery, that is, tumor surgery, causes more voice changes than carotid endarterectomy operations. The elevated objective sound parameters found in this study necessitate that patients should be informed regarding the potential of developing postoperative dysphonia, especially those who rely on their voice as their profession (e.g. sound artists, teachers, politicians). © Author(s).en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.9739/tjvs.2023.04.014
dc.identifier.endpage82en_US
dc.identifier.issn2667-5080
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85176935617en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage78en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.9739/tjvs.2023.04.014
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/102715
dc.identifier.volume32en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTurkish National Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Societyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal of Vascular Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.snmz20240825_Gen_US
dc.subjectcarotid endarterectomy operationen_US
dc.subjectGlomus tumoren_US
dc.subjectmulti-dimensional voice programming (MDVP)en_US
dc.subjectN. larynges supen_US
dc.subjectvoice handicap indexen_US
dc.titlePostoperative objective and subjective voice analysis in patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy and carotid body tumor resectionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu