Reliability and validity of Turkish version of Biological Rhythms Interview of Assessment in Neuropsychiatry

dc.contributor.authorAydemir, Omer
dc.contributor.authorAkkaya, Cengiz
dc.contributor.authorAltinbas, Kursat
dc.contributor.authorKora, Kaan
dc.contributor.authorSuculluoglu Dikici, Didem
dc.contributor.authorAkdeniz, Fatma
dc.contributor.authorKalayci, Fatma
dc.contributor.authorOral, E. Timucin
dc.contributor.authorVahip, Simavi
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-27T21:55:52Z
dc.date.available2019-10-27T21:55:52Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: In this study, it is aimed to perform the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Biological Rhythms Interview of Assessment in Neuropsychiatry. Methods: The study was performed with 79 bipolar type-I disorder, 26 bipolar type-II disorder and 42 major depressive disorder patients attending to mood disorder clinics of three university hospitals and one state training hospital as well as 116 university students consisting healthy control subjects. The mean duration of the illness was 15.1 years for the bipolar groups and 9,3 years for the depressive group. For concurrent validity, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index was used. In the statistical analyzes, internal consistency coefficient, item-total score correlations, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyzes, correlation with the other scale and ROC curve were calculated. Results: The forward and back translation of the Biological Rhythms Interview of Assessment in Neuropsychiatry was performed, and linguistic equivalence was obtained with the scale prepared. In internal consistency, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient was found to be 0.899 and item-total correlation coefficients were between 0.239 and 0.747. In the exploratory factor analysis, a total of three factors representing 56.5% of the total variance were obtained and the themes of the factors were daily activities, sleep and eating habits and interpersonal relations. In the confirmatory factor analysis, confirmatory fit index was 0.932 and root mean square of approximation was 0.065. The correlation between Biological Rhythms Interview of Assessment in Neuropsychiatry and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index was found to be r=0.238. In the sensitivity and specificity analysis, the area under the ROC curve was 0.876. The scale discriminated mood disorder groups from the healthy control group. Conclusion: It is shown that the Turkish version of Biological Rhythms Interview of Assessment in Neuropsychiatry which is used in the assessment of circadian rhythm and functionality is reliable and valid.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage261en_US
dc.identifier.issn1302-6631
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage256en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/48284
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000320265000004en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherCumhuriyet Univ Tip Fak Psikiyatri Anabilim Dalien_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi-Anatolian Journal of Psychiatryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectmood disordersen_US
dc.subjectBiological Rhythms Interview of Assessment in Neuropsychiatryen_US
dc.subjectreliabilityen_US
dc.subjectvalidityen_US
dc.titleReliability and validity of Turkish version of Biological Rhythms Interview of Assessment in Neuropsychiatryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar