The effect of various thermochemical pretreatment methods on the biomethanisation of hemp (Cannabis sativa) hurd and kinetic analysis

dc.authorscopusid57641932600
dc.authorscopusid57639920500
dc.authorscopusid57208752776
dc.authorscopusid57197856670
dc.authorscopusid26534038500
dc.authorscopusid6603843248
dc.authorscopusid57214167459
dc.contributor.authorAric, Alpcan
dc.contributor.authorKaragoz, Sadik Can
dc.contributor.authorOgut, Tuba Ceren
dc.contributor.authorDaglioglu, S. Tugce
dc.contributor.authorDuman, Gozde
dc.contributor.authorYanik, Jale
dc.contributor.authorAzbar, Nuri
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-12T19:51:42Z
dc.date.available2023-01-12T19:51:42Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentN/A/Departmenten_US
dc.description.abstractIn this study, the effects of different pretreatment methods on the biochemical methane potential (BMP) of hurds from two hemp species, namely Narlisaray (NS) and Futura 75 (F), were investigated. The effect of pretreatment on BMP was discussed on the basis of the change in the chemical constituents of the raw material. The highest BMP yields of 272 mL CH4/g VS (F) and 218 mL CH4/g VS (NS) were obtained when the combined alkaline and thermal pretreatment was applied which resulted in the highest amount of hemicellulose degradation. (143% for alkaline and 74% for thermal, respectively, higher than those from raw hurds). It was found that BMP yields and the efficiency of pretreatment for two hemp species depended on genotypes, not on the content of chemical constituents of raw material. Additionally, the first-order kinetic model and the modified Gompertz model were simultaneously used to estimate the CH4 yield results of hurd. The first-order kinetic model resulted in the best fit [R-2 >= 0.96; root mean square error (RMSE) <= 0.225] with predicted yield for untreated control; while for pretreated hurds, the modified Gompertz model was the best fitting one (R-2 >= 0.98; RMSE <= 0.503).en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipTUBITAK [219M123]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was funded by TUBITAK grant no 219M123 in behalf of Prof. Yanik.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s13399-022-02667-y
dc.identifier.issn2190-6815
dc.identifier.issn2190-6823
dc.identifier.issn2190-6815en_US
dc.identifier.issn2190-6823en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85128843763en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02667-y
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/76315
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000788342500003en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Heidelbergen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBiomass Conversion And Biorefineryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectHemp (Cannabis sativa) hurden_US
dc.subjectLignocellulosic materialen_US
dc.subjectBiochemical methane potential (BMP)en_US
dc.subjectPretreatmenten_US
dc.subjectKinetic analysisen_US
dc.subjectAnaerobic digestionen_US
dc.subjectMethane Potential Bmpen_US
dc.subjectBiogas Productionen_US
dc.subjectAnaerobic-Digestionen_US
dc.subjectLignocellulosic Biomassen_US
dc.subjectSodium-Hydroxideen_US
dc.subjectSolid-Stateen_US
dc.subjectCropsen_US
dc.subjectBatchen_US
dc.subjectOpportunitiesen_US
dc.subjectEnhancementen_US
dc.titleThe effect of various thermochemical pretreatment methods on the biomethanisation of hemp (Cannabis sativa) hurd and kinetic analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar