Expectations from Nuclear Medicine from the Perspective of an Orthopedist; [Ortopedist Gözüyle Nükleer Tıptan Beklentiler]

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorKaya H.
dc.contributor.authorDaştan A.E.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-31T07:42:45Z
dc.date.available2024-08-31T07:42:45Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe diagnosis and treatment of musculoskeletal tumors and infections are performed with a multidisciplinary approach that combines clinical findings, radiological imaging, nuclear medicine imaging methods and histopathological evaluation. Although primarily radiological imaging methods are used, nuclear medicine imaging methods are also frequently used in clinical practice in this case group. Nuclear imaging methods are used in the diagnosis of bone and soft tissue sarcomas, in the planning of the biopsy area, in the staging phase, in the evaluation of the treatment response, in the follow-up of local recurrence, and metastasis scans. In addition, nuclear imaging methods such as whole-body bone scintigraphy, single photon emission computerized tomography, positron emission tomography (PET), PET/computerized tomography are used at regular intervals for routine metastasis screening in cases already diagnosed with cancer. Another situation in which nuclear imaging methods are needed is the cases presenting with pathological fractures without known malignancy. In these cases, nuclear imaging methods are frequently used in clinical practice for primary focus investigation and detection of different metastatic foci. In patients with diabetic foot and symptomatic joint replacement prosthesis, septic aseptic separation is a difficult issue, requiring different approaches and treatment planning, and its differential diagnosis is difficult. With classical imaging methods, sufficient information can not be obtained about septic and aseptic separation. At this stage, nuclear imaging emerges as the most important method for diagnosis. In this review, the contribution and importance of nuclear medicine methods in the diagnosis and treatment follow-up of orthopedic diseases are evaluated. © Telif Hakkı 2022 Türkiye Nükleer Tıp Derneğien_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4274/nts.galenos.2022.0002
dc.identifier.endpage14en_US
dc.identifier.issn2149-6447
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85183303679en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage8en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4274/nts.galenos.2022.0002
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/104017
dc.identifier.volume8en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherGalenos Publishing Houseen_US
dc.relation.ispartofNuclear Medicine Seminarsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.snmz20240831_Uen_US
dc.subjectBone and soft tissue tumorsen_US
dc.subjectdiabetic footen_US
dc.subjectinfected prosthesisen_US
dc.subjectmetastasisen_US
dc.subjectnuclear medicineen_US
dc.titleExpectations from Nuclear Medicine from the Perspective of an Orthopedist; [Ortopedist Gözüyle Nükleer Tıptan Beklentiler]en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu