COMPARISON OF CLINICAL FRAILTY SCALE AND EDMONTON FRAIL SCALE IN OLDER ADULTS PRESENTING TO THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridAltuncı, Yusuf Ali/0000-0002-4803-5419
dc.authoridYucel, Mustafa/0000-0003-1818-4189
dc.authoridKarbek Akarca, Funda/0000-0003-2455-8044
dc.authoridKILAVUZ, ASLI/0000-0002-0474-9911
dc.contributor.authorYucel, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorAltunci, Yusuf Ali
dc.contributor.authorOzcete, Enver
dc.contributor.authorKilavuz, Asli
dc.contributor.authorKarbek Akarca, Funda
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-31T07:48:27Z
dc.date.available2024-08-31T07:48:27Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: This study aimed to compare the prognostic values of Edmonton Frail Scale and Clinical Frailty Scale in the emergency department and determine their suitability for patient management. Materials and Method: This study was conducted as a single-center prospective observational study. Patients aged 65 and older who presented to the emergency department were included. Clinical Frailty Scale and Edmonton Frail Scale scores, the emergency department outcomes, length of stay in the emergency department, 30-day mortality, and 30-day readmission data of the patients were recorded. ROC analysis was performed to examine the predictive values on outcomes. DeLong Test was used to compare the predictive values. Results: This study included 400 patients. Intensive care unit admission was significantly more frequent in the frail group according to both Edmonton Frail Scale and Clinical Frailty Scale. The length of stay in the emergency department was significantly longer in the frail group in both classifications. The mortality rate was significantly higher in the frail group in both classifications. The optimal cut off value for predicting mortality was found to be 9 for Edmonton Frail Scale and 7 for Clinical Frailty Scale. There was no significant difference between the predictive values of two scales. Conclusion: We found that two frail scales have good predictive values for adverse outcomes, such as mortality and the need for Intensive care unit admission in the emergency department. We believe that both scores would be valuable in guiding decisions for the emergency department usage due to their similar predictive values.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.29400/tjgeri.2024.384
dc.identifier.endpage117en_US
dc.identifier.issn1304-2947
dc.identifier.issn1307-9948
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage108en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.29400/tjgeri.2024.384
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/104792
dc.identifier.volume27en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001262332200013en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTurkish Geriatrics Socen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal of Geriatrics-Turk Geriatri Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.snmz20240831_Uen_US
dc.subjectGeriatricsen_US
dc.subjectEmergency Serviceen_US
dc.subjectHospitalen_US
dc.subjectFrailtyen_US
dc.subjectFrail Elderlyen_US
dc.subjectMortalityen_US
dc.titleCOMPARISON OF CLINICAL FRAILTY SCALE AND EDMONTON FRAIL SCALE IN OLDER ADULTS PRESENTING TO THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu