Comparison of Autogenous Block Bone Graft and Screw Tent-Pole Techniques for Vertical Bone Augmentation in the Posterior Mandible: A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorIsik, Goezde
dc.contributor.authorGunbay, Tayfun
dc.contributor.authorUyanikgil, Yigit
dc.contributor.authorKisaoglu, Hueseyin
dc.contributor.authorYuce, Meltem Ozden
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-03T20:21:26Z
dc.date.available2021-05-03T20:21:26Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAim: To evaluate the effect on vertical bone augmentation of the screw tent-pole technique using particulate allograft in combination with injectable platelet-rich fibrin, and to compare this with autogenous block bone graft. Materials and Methods: This split-mouth randomized controlled study involved patients with bilateral partial edentulism and vertical bone loss in the posterior mandible. in each patient, the control side was treated with autogenous block bone graft harvested from the mandibular ramus and, on the test side, the screw tent-pole technique was employed, using particulate allograft in combination with injectable platelet-rich fibrin. All augmented sites were covered by leukocyte and platelet-rich fibrin membrane. The primary outcome variable of this study was the radiographic changes to bone height 6 months after augmentation. The secondary outcome variables were the percentage of newly formed bone and the implant survival rate. The data were analyzed with a significance level of alpha = 0.05. Results: of the 13 patients included, a total of 11 patients (7 females, 4 males; mean age 50.92) completed the study. The mean values of vertical bone gain were 1.72 0.78 mm for the test group and 2.83 +/- 0.89 mm for the control group, which constitutes a significant difference (P = .008). The percentage of newly formed bone was 18.08% +/- 2.17% for the test group and 14.26% +/- 1.76% for the control group. The difference between the groups was statistically significant (P < .001). The implant survival rates were 100% for both study groups. Conclusions: Based on the study results, screw tent-pole can be considered a feasible technique for bone augmentation. Further randomized studies will be necessary to fully evaluate vertical bone augmentation using the screw tent-pole technique, with different graft materials and with larger samples.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific Research Committee of the University [16-DIS-026]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was supported by the Scientific Research Committee of the University (16-DIS-026).en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/2320206820976010
dc.identifier.endpage169en_US
dc.identifier.issn2320-2068
dc.identifier.issn2320-2076
dc.identifier.issn2320-2068en_US
dc.identifier.issn2320-2076en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage159en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/2320206820976010
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/69320
dc.identifier.volume12en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000623691700020en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSage Publications India Pvt Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Advanced Oral Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBone augmentationen_US
dc.subjectAutogenous block bone graften_US
dc.subjectScrew tent-pole techniqueen_US
dc.subjectInjectable platelet-rich fibrinen_US
dc.subjectAllograften_US
dc.titleComparison of Autogenous Block Bone Graft and Screw Tent-Pole Techniques for Vertical Bone Augmentation in the Posterior Mandible: A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu