Comparison between effects of halothane and sevoflurane in pediatric outpatient anaesthesia [Gunubirlik cocuk anestezisinde halotan ve sevofluran etkilerinin karasilastirilmasi]

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorCevik A.
dc.contributor.authorErakgun A.
dc.contributor.authorBalcioglu T.
dc.contributor.authorMert S.
dc.contributor.authorUgur G.
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-27T00:27:04Z
dc.date.available2019-10-27T00:27:04Z
dc.date.issued1999
dc.departmentEge Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractInduction, recovery and haemodynamic effects of halothane and sevoflurane were compared in pediatric outpatient anaesthesia. Thirty-one children (aged 2-9 years) undergoing outpatient surgery were randomly divided into two groups. The musk induction was maintained in 16 children with halothane (Group I) and in 15 children with sevoflurane (Group II). Induction of anaesthesia was maintained with halothane (Group I) and with sevoflurane (Group II) in a mixture of oxygen and nitrous oxide (33:67). The inspired concentrations used for inhalation via mask were increased 0.5-1 % every two- three breaths for both groups. Durations of induction (loss of eyelash reflex), eye-opening, recovery and anaesthesia, 10th and 20th min Steward Recovery Score and concentration of gas of both groups compared; heart rate and mean arterial pressure were compared in each group. There wasn't a significant difference between the two groups in duration of induction (Group I: 67.1±14.3 sec, Group II: 63.7±12.8 sec). Whereas duration of eye- opening and recovery periods were found to be statistically significant short in Group II (duration of eye-opening 5±1.6 min vs 7.5±1.2 min, p<0.05, duration of recovery 9.4±2.5 min vs 13.6±3.4 min, p<0.05). However 10th min Steward Recovery Score was found to be a statistically significant high value in Group II (Group II: 5.9±0.4, Group I: 4.8±1.2, p<0.05). In addition, end of induction, end of operation and total concentration of gas were found to be statistically significant high value in Group II (p<0.01). Haemodynamic stability in Group II was observed to be better than in Group I. We conclude that sevoflurane will be an alternative to halothane in pediatric outpatient anaesthesia.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage232en_US
dc.identifier.issn1016-5150
dc.identifier.issn1016-5150en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage229en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11454/23479
dc.identifier.volume27en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurk Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyonen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectHalothaneen_US
dc.subjectPediatric outpatient anaesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectSevofluraneen_US
dc.titleComparison between effects of halothane and sevoflurane in pediatric outpatient anaesthesia [Gunubirlik cocuk anestezisinde halotan ve sevofluran etkilerinin karasilastirilmasi]en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu